Search Results for "negligent act"

2520 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2520 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses GSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of ST Bus Driver Proved, No Contributory Negligence by Motorcyclist. Compensation of Rs.13,52,890/- with 9% interest upheld as just and proper under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (GSRTC) appealed against the judgment and award dated 30.04.2018 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Trib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Lack of Income Proof and Wrong Multiplier. Tribunal's award of Rs.2,25,000 reduced to Rs.1,44,000 with 6% interest as per Second Schedule of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Achalpur, in MACP No.48/2001 dated 30/09/2005, awarding Rs.2,25,000 with 9% i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation for Death of 17-Year-Old Student. Notional Income of Deceased Student Fixed at Rs.3,000 Per Month Instead of Rs.10,000, Applying Multiplier of 18 and Deducting 50% for Personal Expenses.

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 03.05.2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur in M.A.C.P. No.980/2006. The appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Lack of Evidence of Truck Involvement. Tribunal's finding of rash and negligent driving by truck driver set aside as claimants failed to prove that the accident involved the insured truck.

The present appeal was filed by the National Insurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Dhule i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Appreciation of Evidence by Tribunal. Claimant Proves Rash and Negligent Driving Through Panchanama and Witness Testimony Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Shri Anant Sahadev Parsekar, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by ST Corporation in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Bus Driver Upheld. Compensation of Rs 8,27,600 for Death of Primary Teacher in Bus-Jeep Collision Not Excessive.

The appeal was filed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation against the judgment and award dated 27-06-2003 passed by the Motor Accident ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Conviction in Rash Driving Case — Confirms Sentence for Causing Grievous Hurt. Court holds that evidence of injured witnesses and mechanical inspection report sufficiently established rash and negligent driving under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC.

The petitioner, Firoz Mohammed Ali Aga, was the driver of a mini bus (registration no. GA-02/T-4897) that met with an accident on 05/03/2010 near Vadd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Writ Petition Against Refusal to Issue Process for Medical Negligence Under Section 304A IPC. Court Finds Prima Facie Case of Rash or Negligent Act by Doctors Leading to Patient's Death.

The petitioner, Gautam Sadanshiv, filed a criminal complaint alleging medical negligence against respondent doctors (Dr. Laxmi Jawanjal, Dr. Deepak Ga...