Search Results for "implied bar"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "implied bar"

892 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 892 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Proviso to Clause 53 of Statute 24 Is Not Attracted When Employee Is Terminated for Willful Neglect of Duty or Misconduct Covered by Clauses (a) and (b) of Schedule A of Ordinance 6 of College Code. The requirement of prior approval under the proviso applies only to termination simpliciter, not to termination for misconduct under the specified clauses.

20 Feb 2023

The case involves a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur regarding the interpretation of the proviso to Clause 53 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance Decree in Flat Sale Dispute — Agreement to Sell Enforceable Despite Alleged Breach of Conditions. Court holds that time was not of essence in the agreement and that the purchaser was ready and willing to perform, directing execution of sale deed within two months.

12 Jun 2023

The case involves an appeal against a judgment and decree dated 07/08/2013 passed by the learned Judge, City Civil Court, Greater Bombay, in Regular C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows CIDCO's Petition, Quashes Industrial Court Order Directing Permanent Employment of Contractual Employee. Contractual Appointment with Breaks Does Not Automatically Confer Right to Permanency Under MRTU & PULP Act.

5 Oct 2023

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by City Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. (CIDCO) challenging an order of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Returns Plaint in Co-operative Society Dispute for Lack of Jurisdiction Due to 2019 Amendment to MCS Act. Dispute between Society and Developer over redevelopment falls within exclusive jurisdiction of Co-operative Court under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

6 Oct 2022

The Bombay High Court, in an interim application filed by Defendant No. 5 (Parimal H. Solanki) in Suit No. 1190 of 2019, considered whether the Civil ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty and Confiscation Orders in Sand Mining Cases for Violation of Natural Justice. Orders under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 set aside for lack of hearing; matters remanded for fresh consideration.

21 Feb 2020

The judgment involves two writ petitions challenging orders passed under Section 48(7) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. In Writ Petition No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Reinstatement Order in Dispute Over Termination of a Medical Practitioner — Finds Hospital's Termination Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Court Modified Back Wages to 50% for the Period from Termination to Labour Court Award and Full Back Wages Thereafter.

5 Apr 2011

The case involves a dispute between N.M. Wadia Charitable Trust Hospital, Solapur (appellant) and Dr. Ashok Vyankatesh Apte (respondent), a full-time ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Seeking to Unilaterally Implement Notice of Change Under Section 9A of Industrial Disputes Act. Employer Cannot Implement Proposed Changes Without Settlement or Award from Competent Court.

31 Mar 2012

The petitioner, J. D. Orgochem Limited (formerly Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd.), is a company engaged in manufacturing chemicals. The respondent, Dyes and Che...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suit for Cargo Damage Claim Due to Lack of In Rem Jurisdiction and Limitation Bar. The court held that the vessel was not within Indian territorial waters at the time of suit filing and the claim was time-barred under the one-year limitation period under Article III Rule 6 of the Hague Rules.

28 Aug 2019

The plaintiff, Elecon Engineering Company Limited, filed an admiralty suit in rem against the vessel 'Rickmers Dubai' and other defendants for recover...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Revision Against Execution Court Order Refusing to Attach Joint Family Property. UCO Bank's Suit Decreed Against Defendants Jointly and Severally, but Execution Court Held That Property of Non-Defendant Family Members Cannot Be Attached Without Proving That Loan Was for Family Necessity or Business Benefit Under Hindu Law.

17 Oct 2005

The petitioner, UCO Bank, had filed a Special Civil Suit No.94 of 1990 against defendants, including Ramchandra Namdeo Shirke (defendant No.1) and his...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Ex-Parte Arbitral Award in Loan Recovery Dispute. Court holds that non-participation in arbitration despite notice and failure to prove fraud or bias does not warrant setting aside award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Jun 2013

The petitioners, The Loot (India) Pvt. Ltd. and its directors, were borrowers and guarantors who had taken a loan from Reliance Capital Limited (the f...

49 50 51 52 53

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)