Search Results for "discretionary orders"

2002 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2002 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Appeals Against Company Law Board's Investigation Order Under Section 237(b)(i) of Companies Act, 1956. Appeals challenge the order directing investigation into the affairs of companies allegedly linked to Ketan Parekh in the 2001 stock scam.

The judgment pertains to 14 appeals filed by various companies alleged to be controlled by Ketan Parekh, the central figure in the 2001 stock market s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough Applications; Condition to Stay Outside Home District Held Illegal. Condition That Prisoner Must Not Enter District Where Family Resides Defeats Object of Furlough Under Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dealt with two criminal writ petitions filed by convicted prisoners challenging the rejection of their furlough...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Payment of Occupational Charges in Landlord-Tenant Dispute Pending Determination of Applicable Tenancy Law. The Court held that a tenant continuing in possession after forfeiture of lease is liable to pay mesne profits at market rate, not contractual rent, under Section 2(12) CPC.

The Supreme Court was hearing special leave petitions filed by a landlord challenging a judgment of the Calcutta High Court which held that the landlo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Appointment of Technical Assistants as Assistant Engineers Without Statutory Amendment in Tamil Nadu Engineering Service Rules. Technical Assistants Cannot Be Appointed by Transfer Unless Rules Are Amended to Include Them as Feeder Category.

The Supreme Court considered a set of appeals challenging the judgment of the Madras High Court which had allowed the appointment of Technical Assista...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Judgment in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Non-Compliance and Limitation. Bank's Auction Sale Upheld as Borrower's Challenge Was Time-Barred and Requests Did Not Trigger Statutory Obligations Under Section 13(3A) of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The dispute arose from proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SAR...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Amendment and Adjournment in Civil Suit — No Interference with Discretionary Orders Under Order VI Rule 17 and Order XVII Rule 1 CPC.

The appellants, original defendants in a civil suit, filed an appeal challenging two orders passed by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Gangakhed: (1) ...