High Court of Judicature at Bombay Admits Multiple Writ Petitions and Issues Rule — Petitioners seek legal remedy against respondents in civil dispute.
25 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "condition against eviction"
663 result(s) found
Found 663 result(s)
High Court
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Rejection of Order VII Rule 11 Application in Counter-Claim for Possession Based on Leave and License Agreement. The court held that the civil court lacks jurisdiction to entertain a counter-claim based on a leave and license agreement due to the bar under Section 47 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, and that valuation and court fees must be determined based on the relief claimed.
11 Nov 2024The petitioner, original plaintiff, filed a suit for specific performance of contract against the respondent. The respondent filed a written statement...
- 357
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Removing Land Entries in Victimization Case — Dual Stand by Government Authorities Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act and SC/ST Act Leads to Setting Aside of Impugned Order. The court held that the petitioner was victimized by the contradictory stands of the Assistant Commissioner under the Karnataka SC/ST (PTCL) Act, 1978 and the Deputy Commissioner under Section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, and quashed the order directing removal of entries.
17 Feb 2020The petitioner, Krishnappa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash an order dated 10.11.2011 passed by ...
- 155
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Time Was Essence of Contract and Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Limitation Period Under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963 Starts from Date Fixed for Performance; Extension Not Proven.
26 Feb 2019The appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell property at 82, Jor Bagh, New Delhi, dated 05.10.1974, between the plain...
- 553
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Lease Dispute Over Temporary Injunction — Prima Facie Case and Irreparable Injury Established. Lease Deed from 1974 Not Terminated, Appellant's Possession and Business Operations Protected.
23 Jul 2018The appellant, Shri Rajaram M. Caisukar, filed an appeal against an order dated 24/11/2015 passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge, Panaji, dismiss...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Sale Deed of 3/7th Share Validly Executed by Co-owners in Favour of Plaintiff, and Defendant's Possession as Tenant Is Not Adverse to Plaintiff's Title.
30 Jun 2016The appellant, original defendant No. 1, filed a second appeal against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the first appellate court in a ...
- 119
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Petition Challenging Quashing of Process in MMC Act Case — Failure to Prove Service of Notice and Non-Compliance Within Stipulated Period. The court held that the prosecution under Section 475A(1)(a) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, cannot be sustained without strict proof of service of notice under Section 354 and failure to comply within the prescribed period.
7 Mar 2016The petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the order dated 16.5.2011 passed by the Additional...
- 152
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree in Suit Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act — Plaintiff Proved Prior Possession and Dispossession Without Due Process of Law. The Court held that a suit for possession based on prior possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is maintainable even against the true owner if the plaintiff was in settled possession and was dispossessed otherwise than in due course of law.
26 Nov 2015The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the original defendants (Smita Prakash Chikhale and Sunita Dharnidhar Chikhale) against the ju...
- 101
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Act Order for Police Aid — No Locus Standi for Borrower's Partner After Property Sold to Third Party. The Court held that once the secured asset is sold and possession handed over to the auction purchaser, the borrower or its partner has no right to challenge the Section 14 order, and the remedy lies before the DRT under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.
9 Oct 2015The petitioners, M/s. National Laminate Corporation (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Jayantilal L. Nisar, filed a writ petition under Article ...
- 188
