Search Results for "compensation"

11495 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11495 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Cases for Agricultural Land in Latur District. Court determines market value at Rs. 60,000 per acre with 20% deduction for development charges, applying multiplier method.

The judgment involves multiple first appeals filed by claimants whose agricultural lands in Dhalegaon, Taluka Ahmedpur, District Latur were acquired b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced Due to Inadequate Market Value Assessment. Court Held That Reference Court Erred in Not Considering Comparable Sale Instances and Potential Value of Land for Development Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to a writ petition filed by the legal representatives of the original claimant, Sahadeo Mahadik, challenging the judgment and award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Claimant's Appeal for Enhanced Compensation and Partly Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Determined at Rs. 100 per sq.ft Based on Comparable Sale Instances.

The case involves two appeals arising from a land acquisition matter. The land, measuring 1.21 HR (1,29,345 sq.ft) out of Survey No. 118/3 at Digras, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Owner's Petition for Rental Compensation Prior to Section 4 Notification in Land Acquisition Case. Possession Lost Before Notification Does Not Entitle Owner to Additional Compensation Under Section 34 or Rental Compensation Under Government Policy.

The petitioner, Tukaram Maruti Pawar, was a land owner whose land was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for a minor irrigation project. He lost pos...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award Denying Reinstatement to Employee of Closed Family Welfare Centre. Termination Due to Closure of Establishment Not a Retrenchment Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Pradip Patil, was employed as a peon and later as a clerk/storekeeper at the Family Welfare Centre run by Yugantar Education Society i...