High Court of Bombay at Goa Enhances Compensation for Minor Girl Injured in Road Accident — Permanent Scarring on Face Considered for Future Plastic Surgery Costs. The court increased the award from Rs.1,50,000 to Rs.3,00,000 under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, recognizing the need for future medical expenses for a minor with facial scars.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 79
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a minor girl, Deepti Santosh Naik, who was injured in a road accident on 02.05.2007 at age four. She was travelling in a Tata Sierra car with her father when a truck hit the car, causing it to crash into a tree. The front windshield broke, and glass particles pierced her face, leaving permanent scars. Her father filed a claim petition on her behalf seeking total compensation of Rs.6,12,000. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal partly allowed the claim, awarding Rs.1,50,000, apportioned equally between the two insurance companies (New India Assurance for the truck and Oriental Insurance for the Tata Sierra). The appellant (the minor through her father) appealed for enhancement. The High Court considered the heads of claim: medical expenses (Rs.6,000 claimed, Rs.5,000 awarded), special diet and attendant charges (Rs.10,000 claimed, Rs.5,000 awarded), transport charges (Rs.2,000 claimed, Rs.2,000 awarded), and plastic surgery costs (Rs.3,00,000 claimed, Rs.1,38,000 awarded). The court noted that the Tribunal had awarded Rs.1,38,000 for plastic surgery based on a quotation from a hospital, but the appellant argued that the quotation was not exhibited and the amount was insufficient. The court found that the minor would require plastic surgery in the future and that the Tribunal's estimate was reasonable. However, the court enhanced the compensation under other heads: medical expenses increased to Rs.10,000, special diet and attendant charges to Rs.15,000, and transport charges to Rs.5,000. The total compensation was enhanced from Rs.1,50,000 to Rs.3,00,000, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the claim petition until payment. The liability was apportioned equally between the two insurance companies. The court directed the insurance companies to deposit the enhanced amount within eight weeks.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation for Minor - Future Medical Expenses - The court considered whether the Tribunal's award of Rs.1,50,000 was adequate for a minor girl who suffered facial scars requiring future plastic surgery - Held that the compensation should include estimated costs of plastic surgery and other heads, enhancing total to Rs.3,00,000 (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for a minor girl with facial scars from a road accident is adequate, particularly regarding future plastic surgery expenses.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court partly allowed the appeal, enhancing total compensation from Rs.1,50,000 to Rs.3,00,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of claim petition until payment. The enhanced amount to be deposited by the insurance companies within eight weeks, apportioned equally.

Law Points

  • Motor Accident Claims
  • Compensation for Minor
  • Future Medical Expenses
  • Permanent Disability
  • Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (09) 176

First Appeal No. 53 of 2009

2014-09-26

B. P. Dharmadhikari

2014:BHC-GOA:2583

Mr. S. S. Kakodkar for Appellant, Mr. E. Afonso for Respondent nos. 3 and 6

Miss Deepti Santosh Naik (minor) through natural guardian father Shri Santosh Vishnu Naik

1. Shri Raju Suyakant Joshi, 2. Shri Ramakant Karapurkar, 3. The New India Assurance Company Ltd., 4. Shri Rama Govind Gaonkar, 5. Shri Narayan Govind Gaonkar, 6. The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award seeking enhancement of compensation for injuries sustained by a minor in a road accident.

Remedy Sought

Enhancement of compensation from Rs.1,50,000 to Rs.6,12,000 for medical expenses, special diet, attendant charges, transport, and future plastic surgery.

Filing Reason

Inadequate compensation awarded by the Tribunal for permanent facial scars requiring future plastic surgery.

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal partly allowed claim petition awarding Rs.1,50,000 with equal apportionment between two insurance companies.

Issues

Whether the compensation of Rs.1,50,000 awarded by the Tribunal is adequate for a minor girl with facial scars requiring future plastic surgery.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the Tribunal awarded only Rs.1,38,000 for plastic surgery based on a quotation not exhibited, and that the amount is insufficient. Respondent insurance companies supported the Tribunal's award as reasonable.

Ratio Decidendi

In motor accident claims for minors with permanent facial scars, compensation must include reasonable estimated costs of future plastic surgery, and other heads like medical expenses, special diet, and transport should be liberally assessed.

Judgment Excerpts

Minor girl aged about four years, was injured in a road accident on 02.05.2007. The Claim Petition was filed through her father claiming a total compensation of Rs.6,12,000/-. By the impugned Judgment and Award, the Claim Petition has been partly allowed. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal has awarded total compensation of Rs.1,50,000/- and apportioned it equally amongst two Insurance Companies of two vehicles. The appeal is partly allowed. The total compensation is enhanced from Rs.1,50,000/- to Rs.3,00,000/-.

Procedural History

Claim petition filed before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal seeking Rs.6,12,000 compensation. Tribunal awarded Rs.1,50,000 on an unspecified date. Appellant filed First Appeal No. 53 of 2009 before the High Court of Bombay at Goa for enhancement. Heard on 26 September 2014 and judgment delivered same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Section 324 IPC Case — Conviction Set Aside Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Independent Evidence. The appellate court's acquittal was upheld as the prosecution failed to prove th...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be in Conflict with Public Policy or Suffering from Patent Illegality. The court he...