Search Results for "cheque payment"

1865 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1865 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Policy Cancelled Due to Cheque Dishonour Prior to Accident. Insurer Not Liable as No Valid Policy Existed on Accident Date Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The New India Assurance Company Limited appealed against the judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal which held the Insurance Company jointly a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case — Accused Failed to Rebut Presumption Under Sections 118 and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With in Revision.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, S. Mohammed, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Death of Pillion Rider. Negligence of Motorcycle Rider Established, Insurance Company Liable to Pay Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves an appeal by Reliance General Insurance Company Limited against the award of compensation by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction of Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Presumption Under Section 139 Not Rebutted Despite Absence of Loan Documents.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Mrs. Devarsha Dnyaneshwar Parob, the accused, against her conviction under Section 138 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Allowing One Time Settlement in Debt Recovery Case — Interest Must Be Calculated as Per OTS Terms. The court held that the DRT erred in not giving effect to the OTS and in calculating interest beyond the OTS terms, and the DRAT correctly set aside the DRT order.

The petitioners, Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) and India SME Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd., challenged an order dated 26th Ma...