Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Policy Cancelled Due to Cheque Dishonour Prior to Accident. Insurer Not Liable as No Valid Policy Existed on Accident Date Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 22
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The New India Assurance Company Limited appealed against the judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal which held the Insurance Company jointly and severally liable with the owner of the vehicle to pay compensation to the claimants. The accident occurred on 9-5-1994. The insurance policy had been issued on 6-12-1993 upon payment of premium by cheque. The cheque was dishonoured, and the Insurance Company sent a letter by Registered Post Acknowledgment Due on 31-12-1993 informing the insured that the policy was cancelled due to dishonour of the cheque. Thus, on the date of the accident, there was no valid insurance policy in existence. The Tribunal had relied on the Supreme Court judgment in Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Inderjit Kaur and Ors. (AIR 1998 SC 588) to hold the insurer liable. However, the High Court distinguished that case because in Inderjit Kaur, the accident occurred before the insurer communicated the cancellation, whereas in the present case, the cancellation was communicated five months before the accident. The High Court held that the Insurance Company was not liable as the policy stood cancelled prior to the accident. The appeal was allowed, and the Insurance Company was exonerated from liability. The claimants were directed to recover the compensation from the owner of the vehicle.

Headnote

A) Motor Vehicles Act - Insurance - Liability of Insurer - Cheque Dishonour - Cancellation of Policy - Where the premium cheque was dishonoured and the insurer cancelled the policy and informed the insured by registered post before the accident, the insurer is not liable to pay compensation to third parties. The judgment in Oriental Insurance Co. v. Inderjit Kaur (AIR 1998 SC 588) distinguished on facts as in that case the accident occurred before the insurer communicated cancellation. (Paras 3-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation when the insurance policy was cancelled due to dishonour of the premium cheque prior to the accident.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. The judgment of the Tribunal holding the Insurance Company liable is set aside. The Insurance Company is exonerated from liability. The claimants are entitled to recover the compensation amount from the owner of the vehicle.

Law Points

  • Insurance policy cancellation due to cheque dishonour
  • insurer's liability when policy cancelled before accident
  • distinction from Oriental Insurance Co. v. Inderjit Kaur
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (03) 81

First Appeal No. 57 of 1999

2005-03-02

D.G. Deshpande, J.

Mr. M.G. Barve for Appellants, Mr. S.A. Sawant for Respondent no.3, Mr. A.S. Khandeparkar for Respondent No.1(A) and 2

The New India Assurance Co.

1. Shri Balkrishna Shantaram Dhume (since deceased) 1A Smt. Vidya B. Dhume, 2. Smt. Kamal B. Dhume, 3. Mr. Madhukar S. Sawant

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against judgment of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal holding Insurance Company liable to pay compensation.

Remedy Sought

Insurance Company sought exoneration from liability on ground that policy was cancelled due to cheque dishonour before accident.

Filing Reason

Insurance Company challenged Tribunal's order holding it jointly and severally liable with owner.

Previous Decisions

Tribunal held Insurance Company liable relying on Oriental Insurance Co. v. Inderjit Kaur.

Issues

Whether the Insurance Company is liable when the policy was cancelled due to dishonour of premium cheque prior to the accident.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant (Insurance Company): Policy was cancelled on 31-12-1993 due to cheque dishonour, intimated to insured by registered post; no policy existed on accident date (9-5-1994). Respondents (Claimants): Relied on Oriental Insurance Co. v. Inderjit Kaur to contend insurer is liable despite cheque dishonour.

Ratio Decidendi

Where the insurance policy is cancelled due to dishonour of the premium cheque and the insured is informed of the cancellation prior to the accident, the insurer is not liable to pay compensation to third parties. The principle in Oriental Insurance Co. v. Inderjit Kaur applies only where the accident occurs before the insurer communicates cancellation.

Judgment Excerpts

In my opinion this judgment will not help to the owner in the present case, because 5 months before the accident, to be specific that accident took place on 9-5-1994, the policy was cancelled on 31-12-1993 and the owner was informed about the cancellation by Registered Post Acknowledgment due. Therefore, the Insurance Company cannot be held liable.

Procedural History

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal passed an award holding the Insurance Company jointly and severally liable with the owner. The Insurance Company appealed to the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Policy Cancelled Due to Cheque Dishonour Prior to Accident. Insurer Not Liable as No Valid Policy Existed on Accident Date Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision, Upholds Civil Court Jurisdiction in Forced Resignation Case. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Suit Challenging Resignation Obtained by Force, as Dispute Does Not Fall Under Industrial Disputes Act or Spe...