Search Results for "block period"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "block period"

3013 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3013 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Fixed-Term Employees Challenging Termination Upon Expiry of Contract — No Right to Continue After Expiry of Fixed Term. Fixed-term contractual employees have no vested right to continue beyond the contract period, and termination upon expiry does not attract principles of natural justice.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, 23 individuals, were appointed on fixed-term contractual basis by the respondent authorities for a specific period. Upon expiry of th...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Ex-Serviceman's Disability Pension Claim as Barred by Limitation. Writ Petition Against Armed Forces Tribunal's Rejection of 50-Year-Old Claim Not Maintainable Under Section 22 of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007.

5 Mar 2025

The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by an ex-serviceman challenging the order dated 17.06.2022 passed b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand on Sub-Lease of Multiplex — Lease Premium Not Part of Consideration for Sub-Lease Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. The Court held that the expression 'consideration for the sub-lease' in Article 35(a) of Schedule I of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 refers only to the consideration moving from the sub-lessee to the sub-lessor, and not the premium paid by the original lessee to the lessor.

9 Jul 2014

The petitioner, CR Retail Malls (India) Limited, challenged an order dated 21 March 2013 passed by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Maharashtr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Petition Challenging KSAT Order Quashing Recovery of Pay Fixation Benefits from Commercial Tax Officers. Recovery of excess pay without fault of employee held impermissible under Karnataka Civil Services Rules.

18 Feb 2022

The State of Karnataka and the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Karnataka State Administrative Tribu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Blacklisting Order Against Partnership Firm in Railway Tender Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as No Show Cause Notice or Hearing Was Given Before Imposing 5-Year Ban. Blacklisting Without Prior Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Is Arbitrary and Unconstitutional Under Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

1 Dec 2022

The petitioners, Krishi Infratech (a registered partnership firm) and its partner M. Suryanarayana Reddy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Appeals Against Single Judge's Order in Matters Pertaining to Mysore Urban Development Authority. Appeals Filed Under Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 Seeking Setting Aside of Orders Dated 05-08-2013 Passed in Various Writ Petitions.

21 Apr 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka adjudicates multiple appeals and cross-objections arising from land acquisition reference proceedings. The court examines whether the compensation awarded by the Reference Court at Rs.3,06,000 per acre for irrigated lands and Rs.2,04,000 for dry lands is just, considering the challenges of inadequacy and excessiveness raised by the claimants and the State respectively.

24 Apr 2020

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, heard a conglomeration of appeals and cross-objections arising from land acquisition proceedings concer...

High Court

KAHC030005792015_1

24 Apr 2020

The judgment relates to a conglomeration of appeals and cross-objections arising out of land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Karnata...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Appeals on Land Acquisition Compensation for Minor Irrigation Tank. Reference Court's Enhanced Market Value Challenged by Both State and Land Losers.

24 Apr 2020

The High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench heard a conglomeration of appeals filed under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and cross-...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Passed Judgment in Appeals Filed Under Section 54(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court Considered Challenges by State and Landowners Against Reference Court's Compensation Determination for Lands Acquired for Minor Irrigation Tank.

24 Apr 2020

The case involves multiple appeals and cross-objections filed under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and Order 41 Rule 22 of the Code ...

49 50 51 52 53

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)