Search Results for "Video Evidence"

1167 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1167 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Excise Case — Petitioner Not Required for Custodial Investigation. Offences under Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 are not punishable with death or life imprisonment, and no criminal antecedents reported.

The petitioner, Nagaraja, filed a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking anticipatory bail in t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Husband in Dowry Harassment and Cyber Crime Case — Petitioner Granted Pre-Arrest Bail Subject to Conditions. Custodial Interrogation Not Required as Matrimonial Dispute Ongoing and Complaint Alleged to Be False.

The petitioner, R. Prashanth Kumar, filed a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking anticipatory...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Age Discrepancy and Consent. The court found that the victim's age was disputed and she was a consenting party, weakening the prosecution's case under POCSO Act and IPC.

The petitioner, Sri Prasanna Kumar, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail in Crime No.83/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Intent to Kill. Court Held That Allegations of Assault with Wooden Club Did Not Attract Section 307 IPC as There Was No Intention to Cause Death.

The petitioner, Ranjith A.S., filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail in Crime No.133/2020 r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Anticipatory Bail to Husband in Dowry Harassment Case Amidst Reconciliation Efforts. Court Allows Bail Under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Considering Young Age of Parties, Recent Childbirth, and Possibility of Amicable Settlement.

The petitioner, Venu G.A., filed a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking anticipatory bail in connectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Murder Case Under SC/ST Act — Petitioner Not Named in FIR and No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Court Held That When Petitioner Is Not Named in FIR and No Prima Facie Case Is Established, Anticipatory Bail Can Be Granted Under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

The petitioner, Raghu K.K., filed a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking anticipatory bail in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Quashing of Criminal Proceedings in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Settlement Between Parties. Matrimonial Dispute Resolved Amicably — Proceedings Under Sections 498A, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3, 4 Dowry Prohibition Act Quashed Under Section 482 CrPC.

The petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 to 4 in C.C.No.1362/2016 pending before the Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Chickmagalur, filed a petition under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Partly Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Composite Negligence and Enhances Compensation. Tribunal's finding of sole negligence on jeep driver set aside; insurer of jeep held jointly liable with ST bus insurer.

The appellant, original claimant, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 12....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition for Missing Female Baby — No Illegal Detention Established. Court holds that habeas corpus is not maintainable when the alleged detenu is not in custody of respondents and the petitioner fails to prove illegal detention.

The petitioner, Smt. Shankramma Poojari, a fruit vendor, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before...