Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Murder Case Under SC/ST Act — Petitioner Not Named in FIR and No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Court Held That When Petitioner Is Not Named in FIR and No Prima Facie Case Is Established, Anticipatory Bail Can Be Granted Under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 20
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Raghu K.K., filed a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.42/2020 registered at Thirumalashethalli Police Station, Bengaluru Rural District, for offences punishable under Sections 342 (wrongful confinement), 384 (extortion), 302 (murder), 504 (intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace), 506 (criminal intimidation) read with Section 34 (common intention) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 3(2)(v)(a) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (SC/ST Act). The complaint was lodged by Smt. Dhanalakshmi, wife of late Munikullappa, on 10.04.2020. The petitioner was not named in the FIR. The court observed that the petitioner was not named in the FIR and no prima facie case was made out against him. The court granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions including that the petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer within 15 days, shall not tamper with evidence or threaten witnesses, and shall not leave the jurisdiction without prior permission. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Anticipatory Bail - Section 438 Cr.P.C. - Prima Facie Case - Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in Crime No.42/2020 for offences under Sections 342, 384, 302, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 3(2)(v)(a) of SC and ST (POA) Act - The petitioner was not named in the FIR and no prima facie case was made out against him - Court granted anticipatory bail with conditions - Held that when the petitioner is not named in the FIR and no prima facie case is established, anticipatory bail can be granted (Paras 5-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for offences including murder and SC/ST Act when he is not named in the FIR and no prima facie case is made out against him.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The petitioner is granted anticipatory bail in Crime No.42/2020 subject to conditions: (i) Petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer within 15 days from the date of receipt of the order; (ii) Petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or threaten witnesses; (iii) Petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the court without prior permission.

Law Points

  • Anticipatory bail
  • Prima facie case
  • FIR not naming accused
  • Section 438 Cr.P.C.
  • Section 3(2)(v)(a) SC/ST Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 169

Criminal Petition No.2865/2020

2020-07-07

N.K. Sudhindrarao

Sri Praveen Kamath M.R. for petitioner, Sri K. Nageshwarappa, HCGP for respondents 1 and 2

Raghu K.K.

The State of Karnataka, The State of Karnataka by CID, Smt. Dhanalakshmi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.42/2020.

Filing Reason

Petitioner apprehended arrest in connection with offences including murder and SC/ST Act, but was not named in the FIR.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. when he is not named in the FIR and no prima facie case is made out against him.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel argued that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and no prima facie case is made out against him. State opposed the bail application.

Ratio Decidendi

When the petitioner is not named in the FIR and no prima facie case is made out against him, anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. can be granted.

Judgment Excerpts

The substance of the complaint as could be read from the report dated 10.04.2020 lodged by Dhanalakshmi... The petitioner is not named in the FIR and no prima facie case is made out against him.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Petition No.2865/2020 under Section 438 Cr.P.C. before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.42/2020. The matter was taken up through video conference on 07.07.2020 and disposed of on the same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): 438
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 342, 384, 302, 504, 506, 34
  • Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (SC/ST Act): 3(2)(v)(a)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Murder Case Under SC/ST Act — Petitioner Not Named in FIR and No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Court Held That When Petitioner Is Not Named in FIR and No Prima Facie Case Is Established, Anti...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petition Challenging Urban Land Ceiling Order, Directs Consideration of Fresh Application Under New Government Order. The court permitted the petitioners to submit a fresh application under G.O.Ms.No.149 dated 09.02...