KAHC010102062008_1
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "Safeguard Duty"
1192 result(s) found
Found 1192 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Government Order Handing Over Mahabaleshwara Temple Administration to Ramachandrapura Mutt. Petitioners Allege Violation of Rights as Registered Trust and Seek Restoration of Previous Board of Trustees Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution.
10 Aug 2018Multiple writ petitions and writ appeals were filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru challenging Government Order No. KAM.E.56 MU.A.B. ...
- 64
High Court
- 67
High Court
- 58
High Court
- 71
High Court
Bombay High Court heard challenge to deemed conveyance order under MOFA; developer alleged res judicata due to consent decree. Developer contended that Competent Authority lacked jurisdiction under Section 11(3) when consent decree already provided for conveyance.
28 Jul 2026The writ petition was filed by developers challenging an order of deemed conveyance passed by the Competent Authority under Section 11(3) of the Mahar...
- 24
High Court
High Court Upholds Award Directing Absorption of Contract Workers as Permanent Employees. Tribunal's Finding of Sham Contract Upheld as Workers Were Directly Supervised and Paid by Principal Employer Under CLRA Act, 1970.
17 Feb 2016The Airports Authority of India (AAI), a statutory body, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the Award dated 26 Ma...
- 28
High Court
WRIT PETITION NO.2720 OF 2013
1 Oct 2014The writ petitions were filed by municipal employee unions and individuals challenging the legality and constitutional validity of provisions of the B...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Dissents That Designated Court Under MCOC Act Cannot Order Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Without Prior Sanction. Special Court Not a Magistrate and Section 23(1) Bar Overrides Private Complaint Procedure.
22 Dec 2005The Bombay High Court heard a batch of writ petitions involving a common legal question: whether a designated court under the Maharashtra Control of O...
- 18
High Court
High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Election Petition No. 1 of 2009 Concerning Rejection of Nomination Paper. The core issue is whether non-mention of the constituency in the nomination form constitutes a defect of substantial character under Sections 33(1) and 36(2)(b) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
23 Dec 2011The petitioner filed his nomination for the Mumbai North Central Parliamentary Constituency on 9 April 2009. The Returning Officer accepted the nomina...
- 13
