Search Results for "Punitive Order"

759 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 759 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Compulsory Retirement of CISF Head Constable Under Rule 48 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. The court held that the order was based on a review committee's recommendation and adverse entries, and no procedural irregularity or mala fides were shown.

The petitioner, Mahesh Narayan Shukla, a Head Constable in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), challenged an order dated 30 October 2019 by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Excise License Suspension Without Hearing. Suspension of FL3 license under Maharashtra Excise Act, 2002 set aside as principles of natural justice violated.

The petitioners, Vithal Mallu Chintalwar and Kusumbai/Rajabai Gangaram Mundamwar, were holders of FL3 licenses under the Maharashtra Excise Act, 2002,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 1562 2004 AND CONTEMPT PETITION NO.

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Expulsion of MLC for Unparliamentary Conduct and Defiance of Ethics Committee — Principles of Natural Justice Not Violated as Petitioner Waived Right to be Heard by Repeatedly Avoiding Proceedings and Challenging Committee's Authority.

The petitioner, a Member of the Bihar Legislative Council (MLC) from the Rashtriya Janata Dal, challenged his expulsion from the Council based on a re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Murder Case Due to Long Incarceration and Speedy Trial Violation. Right to Personal Liberty Under Article 21 Prevails Over Gravity of Offence in Circumstantial Evidence Case Based on Last Seen Theory.

The applicant, Santosh Pralhad Waghmare, was arrested on 26 March 2017 in connection with C.R. No.76 of 2017 registered at Hill Line Police Station fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Customs Duty Payable on Redemption of Confiscated Goods Under Section 125 of Customs Act, 1962 — Interest Under Section 28AB Also Attracts. Redemption fine does not substitute duty; duty and interest are separate liabilities.

The Supreme Court adjudicated two questions arising under the Customs Act, 1962: whether customs duty is payable when confiscated goods are redeemed a...