Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Excise License Suspension Without Hearing. Suspension of FL3 license under Maharashtra Excise Act, 2002 set aside as principles of natural justice violated.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 115
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Vithal Mallu Chintalwar and Kusumbai/Rajabai Gangaram Mundamwar, were holders of FL3 licenses under the Maharashtra Excise Act, 2002, operating their vends at village Shahapur, Degloor, Nanded. In September 2016, the Collector of Nanded passed orders suspending their licenses under Section 53 of the Act without issuing any show cause notice or affording them an opportunity of hearing. The petitioners challenged these suspension orders by way of a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The core legal issue was whether the suspension of a license without a prior hearing violates the principles of natural justice. The petitioners argued that the suspension was arbitrary and illegal as no opportunity was given to them to explain their position. The respondents, represented by the State, did not contest the matter on merits. The court, after hearing both sides, observed that the power under Section 53 is a drastic power that can be exercised only after following the principles of natural justice. The court held that even if the statute does not explicitly require a hearing, the same must be implied, especially when the suspension is punitive in nature. The court set aside the suspension orders and directed the respondents to restore the licenses. The court also clarified that the respondents are at liberty to proceed against the petitioners in accordance with law after giving them a proper hearing. The judgment was delivered by Justice S.B. Shukre on 8 March 2017.

Headnote

A) Excise Law - Suspension of License - Natural Justice - Section 53, Maharashtra Excise Act, 2002 - Petitioners' FL3 licenses were suspended by the Collector without any prior notice or hearing - Court held that suspension without hearing violates principles of natural justice and set aside the suspension orders - Held that even if the statute does not expressly provide for a hearing, the requirement of natural justice must be read in, especially when the order is punitive and not merely preventive (Paras 4-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the suspension of FL3 license under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Excise Act, 2002 without affording an opportunity of hearing to the licensees is valid in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the suspension orders, and directed restoration of the licenses. The respondents were at liberty to proceed after giving hearing.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • audi alteram partem
  • suspension of license without hearing
  • Section 53 of Maharashtra Excise Act
  • 2002
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (03) 80

Writ Petition No. 2697 of 2017

2017-03-08

S.B. Shukre

Mr. Anil H. Kasliwal for petitioners, Mr. S.R. Yadav (Lonikar), AGP for respondents

Vithal Mallu Chintalwar and Kusumbai / Rajabai Gangaram Mundamwar

The State of Maharashtra through Excise Department, The Collector Nanded, The Superintendent State Excise Degloor, The Senior Superintendent of Police, Police Station Degloor

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging suspension of FL3 excise licenses without hearing.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of suspension orders and restoration of licenses.

Filing Reason

Suspension of licenses by Collector without show cause notice or hearing.

Issues

Whether suspension of license under Section 53 of Maharashtra Excise Act, 2002 without hearing violates principles of natural justice.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that suspension was arbitrary and illegal as no opportunity of hearing was given. Respondents did not contest on merits.

Ratio Decidendi

The power of suspension under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Excise Act, 2002 must be exercised in conformity with principles of natural justice, and a prior hearing is required even if the statute does not expressly provide for it, especially when the order is punitive.

Judgment Excerpts

The power under Section 53 is a drastic power and can be exercised only after following the principles of natural justice. Even if the statute does not expressly provide for a hearing, the requirement of natural justice must be read in.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 2697 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the suspension orders passed by the Collector in September 2016. The court heard the matter on 8 March 2017 and disposed it finally.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Excise Act, 2002: Section 53
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Excise License Suspension Without Hearing. Suspension of FL3 license under Maharashtra Excise Act, 2002 set aside as principles of natural justice violated.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petitions Against Order Quashing MPSC Selection Process for Non-Compliance with Reservation Roster. Court Held That MPSC's Failure to Maintain 200-Point Roster for Backlog Vacancies Violated Constitutional Mandate U...