Search Results for "Gujarat High Court Rules"

2517 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2517 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Land Acquisition Cases — Section 3J Not Violative of Article 14. The Court held that the non-grant of solatium and interest under the National Highways Act, 1956 is not discriminatory and the Act is a complete code.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India, considered the validity of the non-grant of solatium and interest under the Nati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Telecom Company in Industrial Dispute, Holding Regional Business Head Not a 'Workman' Under Industrial Disputes Act. Managerial and Supervisory Duties Exclude Employee from Section 2(s) Definition Despite Absence of Power to Appoint or Dismiss.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s Bharti Airtel Limited against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had held that the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale of Property by Co-operative Bank Under Section 101 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 — Auction Sale Confirmed Despite Alleged Irregularities as Petitioner Failed to Prove Fraud or Collusion.

The petitioner, M/s. Priyesh Land Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition challenging the auction sale of its property by the respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Decides Revenue's Wealth Tax Appeals Involving Definition of 'Assets'. The Appeals Challenge ITAT Orders Regarding Assessment Years 1999-2000 to 2004-05 under Section 2(ea) of Wealth Tax Act, 1957.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of Wealth Tax Appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 27-A of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, against the order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision of Examination Order in Civil Suit — Right to Begin Evidence Not Absolute. Order 18 Rule 1 CPC permits court to direct which party shall begin, but such order can be reconsidered if circumstances change or if earlier order was passed without hearing the other side.

The petitioners, original defendant nos.1, 2, and 3 in Regular Civil Suit No.273/2013, challenged the order dated 15.10.2018 passed by the Civil Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Industrial Dispute Case — Termination of Workmen Held Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Employer Failed to Prove Abandonment of Service by Workmen, and Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld.

The appellant, M/s. Indo-European Breweries Ltd, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 3212...