Search Results for "Delay Condone"

1009 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1009 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revision Petition in Arbitration Dispute Under Bihar Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal Act, 2008 - Reference Not Barred by Limitation as Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963 Applies and Tribunal Had Power to Extend Period Under Section 18 of the 2008 Act.

The dispute originated from a works contract for drainage work in an industrial area, awarded by the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority to th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition for Inordinate Delay of 794 Days — Condonation Refused Due to Unsatisfactory Explanation. Delay of 794 days in filing review petition not condoned as explanation was unsatisfactory, leading to dismissal on limitation grounds.

The State of Gujarat and another petitioner filed a review petition before the Supreme Court against an order in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 33...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in MACP Scheme Financial Upgradation Dispute. Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Entitles Employees to Next Higher Grade Pay, Not Grade Pay of Next Promotional Post.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against orders of various High Courts and Central Administrative Tribunals...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Appeal on Limitation Grounds in Electricity Act Case — Limitation Period for Appeal Under Section 127 of Electricity Act, 2003 is 30 Days but Appellate Authority Has Power to Condon Delay.

The petitioner, Adani Power Maharashtra Limited, challenged an order dated 6.4.2009 passed by the Superintending Engineer, Nagpur Region, Electrical I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Vacation of Status Quo in Land Encroachment PIL — Government's Inaction Over Six Years Leads to Third-Party Rights

The case originated from a public interest litigation filed by Respondents in the Madras High Court alleging illegal land transactions in Thazham...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Challenges for Housing Scheme — Upholds Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act and Karnataka Housing Board Act. Petitioners failed to demonstrate any violation of statutory provisions or fundamental rights in acquisition for public purpose.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their lands for a housing scheme by the Karnataka H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision Application Filed by Original Plaintiff Against Order Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree — Defendant Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Absence. Litigant Must Inform Court or Advocate of Change of Address and Cannot Blame Advocate for Non-Appearance.

This civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 arose from an order of the City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Dismissal of Revision Applications as Time-Barred Under MRTU & PULP Act. Limitation for Revision under Section 44 is Governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act, Not Article 113.

The petitioners, employees of the Irrigation Project, Ratnagiri, were appointed as River Gauge Readers and Rain Gauge Readers between 1979 and 1991. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Under Section 14(2) of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Arbitrator's Termination of Proceedings for Delay in Filing Statement of Claim. Arbitrator's Refusal to Condoned Minimal Delay and Termination Held Arbitrary and Amounting to De Jure Inability to Act.

The petitioners, original claimants in arbitral proceedings, filed a petition under Section 14(2) and Section 32(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliatio...