Search Results for "Customs appeal"

1763 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1763 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Non-Party Neighbour in Balcony Construction Dispute — Leave Granted as Aggrieved Person Under Order 43 Rule 1A CPC. The court held that a non-party can appeal if aggrieved and applies for leave, relying on Province of Bombay v. Western India Automobile Association.

The case involves an appeal filed by Kiran Ramesh Kothari, a neighbour of the plaintiff in a suit, against an order protecting a balcony construction....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Central Excise Duty Demand and Penalty. Petitioner failed to show any jurisdictional error or perversity in concurrent findings of fact regarding duty demand and penalty under Central Excise Rules.

The petitioner, M/s. Mandovi Ispat Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay at ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Case — Limitation Bar and Exemption Eligibility Upheld. CESTAT's finding of bona fide belief based on Commissionerate clarification and acceptance of CSIO/ADA certificate for exemption under Notification No.10/97-CE sustained.

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Bengaluru-V Commissionerate, against the order dated 08.01.2015 passed by the Customs, Exc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Tribunal Correctly Held Commissioner Not Justified Under Section 263 for Alleged Double Deduction of Excise Duty. Assessing Officer Followed Permissible View and Assessee Did Not Claim Deduction Twice.

The present appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Rejection of KVSS Declaration — Post-Manufacturing Expenses Dispute. The court held that an appeal is pending until the order is communicated to the party, and thus the declaration under Section 95 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 1998 was validly filed.

The petitioner, M/s. Pepsico India Holdings Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing aerated water, soft drinks, and fruit-pulp based drinks, was issu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Findings in Property Dispute Involving Customary Adoption of Gharjamai. Custom of Gharjamai recognized as valid under local tribal customs, and concurrent findings of fact not interfered with under Article 136.

The case involves a property dispute among members of the Oraon tribe in Jharkhand. The original plaintiff, Sukhu Oraon (grandson of the original Sukh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Service Tax Levy on Irrigation Restoration Charges Paid to State Government. State's Collection of Charges for Water Diversion is a Sovereign Function, Not a Taxable Service Under Finance Act, 1994.

The petitioner, Rattan India Power Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Seizure of Vehicles Under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 — Held That Seizure Without Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Section 105 of the Act Requires Show-Cause Notice Before Confiscation.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by owners of vehicles that were seized by the State Excise Department under Section 105 of the M...