Search Results for "Civil Procedure Code, 1908"

5109 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5109 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Leave to Sue Under Section 92 CPC for Public Trust Dispute. Section 52 of Maharashtra Public Trust Act Bars Application of Sections 92 and 93 CPC to Public Trusts.

The petitioners, members of Mahad Taluka Maratha Seva Sangh, a trust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950 and the Societies Registr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Application for Judgment on Admissions in Admiralty Suit. Plaintiff Seeks Relief Under Order XII Rule 6 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Alleging Admissions by Defendants.

The present matter concerns an interim application filed by the plaintiff, Raj Transport and Trading Company, in the pending Admiralty Suit No. 17 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Matter — No Provision for Review Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Review petition under Section 114 CPC held not maintainable against order under Sections 27(1) and 27(2) of the Act.

The review petitioner, National Insurance Company Limited, filed a review petition under Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking reca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Caste Certificate Claim for Scheduled Tribe Status in Dhangar Community Case. Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee's Rejection Based on Vigilance Cell Report and Government Records Supporting the Claim Under Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950.

The petitioner, Shripad Ganpat Ughade, a minor represented by his father Ganpat Gundiba Ughade, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Defendant's marks 'Ultraplus Cement', 'Ultra HiTouch', and 'UltraPower' held deceptively similar to registered 'UltraTech' marks under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiffs, UltraTech Cement Limited and another, filed a commercial IP suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, M/s. Shiv C...