Search Results for "Binding Agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Binding Agreement"

3732 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3732 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Right of Pre-emption in Partition Deed Covenant Binding on Successors-in-Interest. Covenant Not Expressly Binding Assignees Held Enforceable Against Subsequent Purchasers with Notice, and Rule Against Perpetuities Held Inapplicable to Personal Pre-emption Agreements.

6 Sep 1966

The dispute arose out of a partition suit between two brothers, T and K, which was referred to arbitration. The arbitration award divided the joint pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition in Redevelopment Dispute — Dissenting Member Cannot Obstruct Majority Decision for Dilapidated Building. Court Appoints Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to Resolve Dispute Between Developer, Society, and Dissenting Member.

12 Mar 2021

The Bombay High Court dealt with an arbitration petition filed by Chirag Infra Projects Pvt Ltd, the developer, against Vijay Jwala Cooperative Housin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Binding on Owner as Attorney Exceeded Authority. Court holds that a power of attorney must be strictly construed and the attorney cannot bind the principal beyond the express terms of the power, setting aside the decree for specific performance.

15 Jan 2013

The 1st respondent, R. Krishnamurthy, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell property No.1236, 3rd Cross, I Block, HAL III Stag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Municipal Councillors under Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965. The Minister's order was impugned on grounds of non-application of mind, lack of statutory violation, and absence of malafide intent.

6 May 2016

The writ petition was filed by ten elected members of the Katol Municipal Council, including the President, ex-President, and councillors, challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute Despite Non-Compliance with Pre-Arbitration Notice Period. The court held that the respondent's failure to respond to the notice and its conduct constituted waiver of the 30-day notice requirement under Clause 64(3)(b)(ii) of the Indian Railways Standard General Conditions of Contract.

3 Apr 2024

The applicant, S. N. Naik & Brothers, a proprietary concern, entered into a contract with the Union of India (respondent) on 23.09.2019 for constructi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Contractor's Petition and Dismisses State's Petitions in BOT Contract Dispute — Extension of Concession Period and Damages for Suspension of Toll Collection Upheld. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of the BOT contract regarding extension of concession period and damages, finding no error apparent on the face of the award under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940.

12 Feb 2015

The judgment concerns three arbitration petitions arising from two arbitral awards under the Arbitration Act, 1940, relating to a Build, Operate and T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Chit Fund Dispute — Holds That Chit Funds Act Does Not Bar Arbitration of Disputes Under Chit Agreements. The Court Ruled That Section 64 of the Chit Funds Act, 1982 Does Not Impliedly Exclude Arbitration, and the Arbitrator Had Jurisdiction to Decide the Claims.

28 Jun 2019

The petitioner, Dinesh Jaya Poojary, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award da...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine and Enforceable Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Discrepancies in Pleadings.

5 Mar 2020

The appellant, Harish, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 05.12.2008 allegedly executed by the respondents in his fav...

High Court

Bombay High Court pronounces judgment on Letters Patent appeals in oppression and mismanagement case under Companies Act, 1956 — dispute over diversion of Contship agency business. The Court examined whether directors' diversion of business opportunity amounted to oppression and breach of fiduciary duty under Sections 397, 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 88 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882.

31 Mar 2006

The appeals arose from a dispute between the Puri Group and the Sippy Group, both holding equal shares and equal directorships in two private Indian s...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Appointment of Arbitrator in Arbitration Dispute Over Distributorship Agreement. The Court affirmed that Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, applies to ensure arbitrator neutrality, overriding prior arbitration clauses that designate potentially biased arbitrators, such as a party's Chairman.

9 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from a distributorship agreement dated March 31, 2015, between Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited (the petitioner) and ...

49 50 51 52 53

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)