Search Results for "validity period"

6687 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6687 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Arbitration Petition Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Petition Challenged Interim Measures Granted by Arbitral Tribunal in Terminalling Service Agreement Dispute.

The petitioner, Gujarat Chemical Port Terminal Co. Ltd., constructed port terminal facilities at Dahej, Gujarat, including tanks for handling and expo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Matters to Final Hearing on Whether Pre-execution Challenge to COFEPOSA Detention Orders Can Be on Grounds Beyond Alka Subhash Gadia Exceptions. The Court Examined if New Grounds Such as Absence of Live Link and Delay Could Be Used to Challenge Detention Orders Before Execution.

The Supreme Court dealt with a batch of matters challenging detention orders passed under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smugg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Prior Sale as Valid Despite Unregistered Deed. Subsequent Purchaser's Deed Declared Void Ab Initio Due to Notice of Earlier Sale Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The dispute pertains to a portion of land admeasuring 1.70 hectares out of Survey No.13/1 of village Shelavli, Palghar. The plaintiffs (Respondent Nos...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains Defendant from Using Similar Trademark in Instant Adhesive Case. Affirms Likelihood of Confusion Between 'FEVIKWIK' and 'KWIKHEAL' Based on Overall Similarity of Marks and Trade Dress.

The plaintiff, Pidilite Industries Limited, a leading manufacturer of adhesives and sealants, filed a suit against Poma-Ex Products and others for tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Sales Tax Incentive Scheme. Retrospective Operation of Section 41B of Bombay Sales Tax Act and Rule 31AA Upheld as Valid and Not Violative of Vested Rights.

The petitioners, M/s. Prasad Power Control Pvt. Limited and its director, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 41B of the Bombay Sales Ta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Import Restriction for Areca Nuts — Condition Requiring NOC from FSSAI Held Ultra Vires. Import Policy Condition Violates Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 of Constitution as It Lacks Statutory Authority and Is Disproportionate.

The petitioner, Siddhi Vinayak, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1913, engaged in the import of areca nuts (commonly kn...