W.P. (MD) No.35806 of 2025
23 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "retrospective policy"
582 result(s) found
Found 582 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses LIC's Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Application in Tenancy Suit — Small Causes Court Has Jurisdiction to Decide Tenancy Despite Premises Being Public Premises Under Public Premises Act. Section 15 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 Does Not Bar Civil Suit for Declaration of Tenancy Where Applicability of Act is Disputed.
3 Jul 2026The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), the applicant, challenging the order of the Small C...
- 42
High Court
Gujarat High Court Allots Special Civil Application Challenging Baroda Cricket Association Election Candidates' Eligibility. Court Grants Ad-Interim Relief Permitting Voting but Restrains Counting of Votes Pending Final Disposal of Petition.
16 Mar 2026The present matter before the Gujarat High Court concerned a challenge to the candidature of four individuals for the posts of President, Secretary, a...
High Court
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court adjudicates writ petition for regularization of watchman services and continuation of sanction under government orders; the court examines whether the Division Bench guidelines in (2008) 4 MLJ 289 were satisfied and directs report on action taken.
18 Feb 2025The writ petition was filed by a watchman and the CSI High School, Manamadurai, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Government of Tamil Nadu, rep...
- 64
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Considers Land Acquisition Lapse Challenge Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Petitioners, landowners, argued that acquisition for BTM Layout had lapsed due to non-payment of compensation, and the appeals arose from a Single Judge's common order dated 14.12.2017.
19 Apr 2021The writ appeals arise from a common order dated 14.12.2017 passed by the Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka. The appellants, landowners and ...
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Act No.4 of 2015 and Claim for Additional Increment by Aided School Staff. The case examines whether aided school employees are entitled to Kannada language increment on par with government staff and if the amendment nullifying such benefit is valid.
24 Jul 2020The writ petitions were filed by teaching and non-teaching staff of private aided educational institutions in Karnataka, challenging the constitutiona...
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Excise License Fee Hike — License Fee Enhancement for CL-2, CL-7, and CL-9 Licenses Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Section 17 of Karnataka Excise Act, 1965. Court Held That the Fee Is a Privilege Fee and Not a Tax, and the Government's Policy Decision Is Not Arbitrary.
24 Jun 2014The petitioners, who are holders of CL-2, CL-7, and CL-9 excise licenses for retail sale of liquor and bars/restaurants in Hubli and Gadag districts, ...
- 38
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions by Cable Operators Challenging Denial of Compounding Option Under Entertainment Tax Laws. The court upheld the amendments to Rule 41-G and Section 4D as valid and non-discriminatory, rejecting claims of violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 300A.
1 Mar 2013The petitioners, M/s Hathway Krishna Cable (P) Limited and Hathway Cable & Datacom Pvt. Limited, are Multi System Operators (MSOs) providing cable tel...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Ministerial Power Over Cooperative Bye‑Law Amendments and Election Officer’s Authority to Suspend Polls; Petition Challenges Amendment Clubbing Constituencies to Favour Existing Committee. Provisions of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, Sections 4, 13, 73H, 73IB, 77A, and 152 Interpreted in Context of Alleged Manipulation to Avoid Elections.
6 Nov 2006The writ petition was filed before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court by members of a cooperative society. The society had not held elections f...
- 132
