Search Results for "registered dealer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "registered dealer"

612 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 612 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Retail Liquor Dealers' Challenge to Sales Tax on Pre-December 1998 Stock. Circular and Notifications imposing 8% sales tax on liquor stock manufactured before 9th December 1998 held valid and not retrospective.

31 May 2017

The petitioner, Maharashtra Retail Liquor Dealers' Association, representing retail liquor licensees holding FLII Licence under the Bombay Prohibition...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Valuers in Cheque Dishonour Case — No Offence Under Section 138 NI Act as Complainant Failed to Prove Debt Legally Enforceable. The court held that the presumption under Section 139 NI Act is rebuttable and the complainant must prima facie show a legally enforceable debt.

6 Dec 2017

The judgment pertains to three criminal applications filed by Ramesh Dahyalal Shah, Yardi Prabhu Consultants & Valuers Pvt. Ltd., and Ashwinkumar Shet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Service Tax Demand on Construction of Port Services. Services by way of construction of original works pertaining to a port are exempt from service tax under Notification No.25/2012-ST dated 20.06.2012, Entry No.14.

14 Dec 2018

The petitioners, JSW Dharmatar Port Pvt. Ltd. and JSW Jaigarh Port Ltd., are companies engaged in developing and operating ports. In the course of the...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

7 Oct 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Exemption Under Section 11 for Trust After Trust Deed Amendment Removes Dominant Control. Court Finds Predominant Object Charitable Despite Initial Rejection Based on Earlier Assessment Years.

26 Jul 2005

The appeal arose from the refusal of the Income Tax Department to grant exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the respondent trust...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Show Cause Notices Issued Under Repealed Drugs (Prices Control) Order, 1979. Petition Challenges Recovery of Alleged DPEA Liabilities Arising Under Paragraph 7(2) of DPCO 1979 Post-Repeal, Alleging Violation of Articles 14, 265, and 300A.

22 Dec 2011

The writ petition was filed by Indian Drugs Manufacturers Association and Organization of Pharmaceutical Producers of India, acting on behalf of their...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Manufacturer in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case — Sale to Another Manufacturer for Further Processing Not a Contravention. The Court held that sale of Nitrous Oxide I.P. by a licensed manufacturer to another manufacturer for further manufacturing does not violate Section 18(a)(vi) read with Rule 65(5)(1)(b) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, as the definition of 'manufacture' under Section 3(f) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 includes repacking and refilling.

28 Jan 2025

The present appeal arises from a criminal complaint filed by the Drugs Inspector, Kadapa, against several accused, including the appellants (Accused N...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Insurer's Appeal in Motor Vehicle Insurance Claim Due to Expired Temporary Registration. Driving Vehicle Without Valid Registration After Temporary Registration Expiry Constitutes Fundamental Breach of Policy Terms Under Sections 39 and 192 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Entitling Insurer to Repudiate Claim.

30 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from an insurance claim repudiation by United India Insurance Co. Ltd. after the theft of the respondent's Bolero car. The responden...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against SARFAESI Proceedings — Tenant's Claim Not Established. The court held that the appellant failed to prove tenancy and that the remedy under Section 17 of the Securitisation Act is available to any person aggrieved, including tenants.

14 Feb 2020

The appellant, Modinasab Indikar, filed a first appeal before the High Court of Bombay at Goa against the order of the District Magistrate, Salcete, d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Modvat Credit in Central Excise Case Due to Lockout Causing Delay in Receipt of Goods. Notification dated 30.3.1994 restricting credit after 30.6.1994 for gate passes issued before 1.4.1994 held inapplicable where delay was due to lockout, a force majeure event.

21 Sep 2010

The petitioners, N R C Limited and Mr. Ashokan A., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a Notification dat...

48 49 50 51 52

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)