Search Results for "procedural delay"

2006 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2006 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband to Lead Evidence First in Property Dispute with Wife — Order 18 Rules 1 and 2 CPC Interpreted. Husband Must Prove His Case as He Would Be Defeated if No Evidence Is Given, Given His Admission of Wife's Payment.

The case involves a property dispute between husband and wife. The wife filed a petition seeking a declaration that she is the sole owner of one of tw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Awards in Muster Roll Employee Reinstatement Cases. Muster Roll Employees Working for 240 Days in a Calendar Year Are Entitled to Reinstatement Under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The present batch of writ petitions was filed by the State of Maharashtra and its officers challenging the common judgment and order passed by the Lab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010822332025_1

The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Transfer Application Under CPC Section 24 in Trademark Infringement Suit — Maintainability of Interim Application Questioned. Registrar of Trade Marks' Status as Subordinate Court Under CPC and Proper Forum for Transfer Application Examined.

The matter concerns an application for transfer of trademark rectification proceedings from the Registrar of Trade Marks to the Bombay High Court, to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates on Regularization of Muster Roll Workers in Assam. Division Bench's Reversal of Single Judge's Regularization Direction Under Scrutiny.

The present batch of appeals originated from a common judgment and order dated 8th June 2017 passed by the Division Bench of the Gauhati High Court in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court heard cross-appeals from NCLAT order partly reversing NCLT’s finding on trademark ownership during CIRP; cross-appeal challenged NCLT’s jurisdiction to determine title under Section 60(5) IBC.

The dispute originated in the corporate insolvency resolution process of Fort Gloster Industries Limited (corporate debtor), which was admitted into C...