Madras High Court Decides Second Appeal Challenging Concurrent Decrees of Lower Courts. The Appeal Filed Under Section 100 of CPC Arose from Suit No.414 of 1994, and the High Court Delivered Judgment on 14 July 2026.
14 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "present demise"
1119 result(s) found
Found 1119 result(s)
High Court
CMA NO.2543 OF 2018
19 Feb 2025The dispute arose over the legal heirship and terminal benefits of deceased Sundaramoorthy, who worked as a clerk in the Corporation of Chennai and di...
- 22
High Court
Madras High Court Considers Plaintiff’s Suit for Declaration of Title and Compensation for Land Acquired for Chennai Metro Rail. Suit Filed Under CPC Order VII Rule 1 and Madras High Court Original Side Rules Seeks Compensation for Grama Natham Land in Saligramam Village.
2 Feb 2025The plaintiff, D. Shankar, instituted Civil Suit No. 725 of 2018 before the Madras High Court seeking a declaration of ownership over three parcels of...
- 56
Supreme Court
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 – Adoption & Absolute Ownership – Sale and Gift Deeds – Partition & Legal Heirship – Validity of Transactions. Adoption does not divest property already vested – Absolute ownership under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act – Validity of Sale and Gift Deeds examined.
2 Jan 2025Acts and Sections Discussed: Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 136 (Special Leave to Appeal) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Order 2...
- 608
High Court
Madras High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging Fishery Auction Notice Issued Without Cancellation of Patta. Petitioner Claims Inherited Rights from 1942 Court Auction Sale Under Constitution of India, Article 226.
4 Mar 2025The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari to quash a fishery public auction notice. The ...
- 45
High Court
Madras High Court Adjudicates Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act for Alleged Disproportionate Assets. Appellants Challenged Conviction on Grounds of Procedural Irregularities and Erroneous Calculation of Assets.
1 Jul 2026The criminal appeal before the Madras High Court arises from a conviction by the Special Judge for CBI Cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Suit — Limitation and Cause of Action Are Triable Issues. Court holds that Order VII Rule 11 CPC application cannot be decided on disputed facts regarding knowledge of sale deeds and limitation.
9 Aug 2024The Bombay High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Application filed by Defendant No.15 (M/s. Mahabharat Builders) challenging the trial court's order d...
- 349
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Late Filing of Written Statement in Commercial Suit — Service of Writ of Summons Not Mandatory When Defendant Has Entered Appearance and Received Plaint and Notice of Motion. The court held that the object of service of summons is to give notice, and if the defendant has already appeared and received the plaint, formal service is not required under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC and Section 16 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
21 Dec 2022The Petitioner, Metro Ortem Ltd, a public limited company, filed a Commercial Suit No. 3 of 2019 before the Bombay City Civil Court at Mumbai against ...
- 38
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears State's Appeal Against High Court Acquittal of Nine Accused in Dr. Subbiah Murder Case — Conviction and Death Sentences Set Aside by High Court on Conspiracy and Common Intention Charges. High Court Acquitted All Accused Rejecting Prosecution's Evidence on Conspiracy and Murder Under Sections 120-B, 302/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.
1 Jan 1970The present criminal appeals arose from the murder of Dr. Subbiah, a reputed doctor at Billroth Hospital, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai. On 14.09.2013,...
- 37
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Restores Concurrent Findings of Fraud in Property Dispute Between Siblings — General Power of Attorney and Sale Deeds Set Aside as Void. The court held that the plaintiff had sufficiently proved fraud by preponderance of probabilities, and the High Court erred in reversing the concurrent findings without establishing perversity.
1 Jan 2020The dispute arose between the plaintiff, Joginder Kaur (since deceased, represented by her daughter Nirmal Gill), and her step-brothers and step-siste...
- 309
