Bombay High Court Examines Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act to Arbitral Award Concerning Lease Agreement and Income Tax Depreciation Issues.
16 Jul 2013...
Search Results for "ownership evidence"
3162 result(s) found
Found 3162 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Resumption Notice — High Court's Dismissal of Writ Petition Set Aside. The Court Held That the High Court Erred in Dismissing the Writ Petition on the Ground of Disputed Questions of Title When the Earlier Division Bench Had Already Declared the Resumption Notice Illegal Under the Same Facts.
15 Mar 2019The dispute pertains to a property in Pune, originally owned by Burjorji Goostadji and Cooverbai Homi Karani, who sold it to Mohammad Hajjibhoy in 192...
- 168
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Decree for Deficit Court Fee Recovery. Appellants' suit for declaration of title and injunction dismissed for failure to pay proper court fee on market value of property.
18 Sep 2025The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of an immovable property. The trial cou...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Plaintiff failed to prove joint family property and possession within limitation under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
29 Mar 2022The case involves a second appeal filed by the plaintiffs, who were the widow and daughters of Daulatram, against the dismissal of their suit for part...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.
29 Jul 2011This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Award for Failure to Prove Ownership. Petitioner's claim of title based on a 1962 sale deed was unsupported by documentary evidence, leading to dismissal of writ petition.
24 Aug 2005The petitioner, Sayed Mohamed Shah Abdul Hamid Kadri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cour...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Over Adverse Possession — Concurrent Findings Set Aside Due to Misapplication of Burden of Proof and Failure to Consider Documentary Evidence.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a second appeal filed by the legal representatives of the original plaintiff, Kuiro Bhikaro Gaonkar (deceased), against the judgment...
- 92
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in Land Grabbing Case — Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction Over Title Suit. Section 20 of Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 Does Not Mandate Transfer of Suit Where No Land Grabbing Allegation is Made by Government.
14 Mar 2019The petitioner, Joseph Saldhana, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 30.10.2018 passed by the 1st Additional Civil Judge, Mangaluru, in ...
- 99
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in Land Grabbing Case — Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction Over Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Section 20 of Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 Does Not Mandate Transfer of Civil Suit Where No Allegation of Land Grabbing is Made in Plaint.
14 Mar 2019The petitioner, Joseph Saldhana, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 30.10.2018 passed by...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking De-Registration of Cooperative Housing Society Registered 45 Years Ago. Court holds that post-registration events cannot be grounds for de-registration under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.
2 Jul 2026The case involves a rather unusual circumstance where the director of the Petitioner-company has sued himself in connection with proceedings for de-re...
- 62
