Search Results for "money order refused"

2776 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2776 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Order Refusing Territorial Jurisdiction Under Section 9. Court Holds That Part of Cause of Action Arising in Goa Confers Jurisdiction on Goa Courts.

The appellants, M/s. Nivaran Solutions and its partners, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Order Refusing Territorial Jurisdiction for Section 9 Application. Court Holds That Cause of Action Arises Partly in Goa Where Agreements Were to Be Performed, Conferring Jurisdiction on Goa Courts.

The appellants, M/s. Nivaran Solutions (a partnership firm) and its partners, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition by State of Maharashtra Against Consent Order in Writ Petition — Concession by Government Advocate Binding on State. The court held that the State cannot resile from a concession made by its advocate, as it would be an abuse of process.

The judgment pertains to a Review Petition filed by the State of Maharashtra seeking review of an order dated 13/12/2019, which disposed of Writ Petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Builder's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Forfeiture of Earnest Money — Reduces Forfeiture from 20% to 10% of Basic Sale Price. Court upholds NCDRC's power to strike down unconscionable contractual terms but modifies interest rate and forfeiture percentage based on facts.

The present appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by the respondents (buyers) against the appellant (builder, Godrej Projects Development Limi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquitted Accused's Writ Petition for Rs.200 Crore Compensation as Acquittal Does Not Automatic Entitlement. The Court Holds That Compensation Under Article 226 Requires Proof of Malicious Prosecution and Violation of Fundamental Rights, Not Mere Acquittal.

The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was filed by the peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Upholding Eviction: Court Rules in Favor of Landlord Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act" "Conclusive Evidence in Written Agreements Seals Eviction; Jurisdictional and Procedural Claims Dismissed"

The case involves the eviction proceedings under Section 24 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, based on Leave and License Agreements between t...