Search Results for "money order refusal"

1256 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1256 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Civil Revision on Willful Default in Rent under Hyderabad Houses (Rent, Eviction and Lease) Control Act, 1954. Tenant Challenges Concurrent Eviction Orders, Arguing Joint Family Tenancy and Non-Willful Default.

The matter arose from a civil revision application filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, challenging concurrent decis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Seeking Enforcement of RBI COVID-19 Moratorium Package. Petitioner Challenges Banks' Denial of Moratorium Under RBI Circular Dated 27.03.2020.

Velankani Information Systems Limited, a company operating an IT park and a five-star hotel in Bengaluru, availed term loans aggregating Rs. 475 crore...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty for Unconsummated Transactions Under Section 49 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner's applications for refund were within limitation period and refusal by authorities was arbitrary.

The petitioner, Vilas Eknath Nandgude, filed six writ petitions challenging orders dated 31 December 2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Criminal Bail Application Involving Gaurav Arjun Patil. The Court Rules on Bail Sought Under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, heard an application for bail filed by Gaurav Arjun Patil against the State o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Promoter in Co-operative Dispute Under Section 94(3)(c) MCS Act. Co-operative Court's Power to Implead Parties Is Not Restricted to Persons Enumerated Under Section 91(1)(a) to (e) and Includes Necessary Parties for Effective Adjudication.

The petitioners, members of Bramha Suncity Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed Dispute No.106/2021 before the Co-operative Court under the Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs. 3,00,100/- for Electronic Stamps Purchased Under Wrong Scheme Code. Mistake of Law Does Not Bar Refund When Stamps Not Used and No Unjust Enrichment.

The petitioner, Manjeet Singh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a refund of stamp duty paid under a mistake of law. The peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Anti-Dumping Duty Notifications as Belated and Misconceived. Refund Claim for Rs. 9.24 Crore Rejected Due to Delay and Laches, as Petition Filed After Six Years from Imposition of Duty.

The petitioner, Sansar Texturisers Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two notifications dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Bail Applications of Accused Persons in Murder Case Registered at Kamakshipalya Police Station. Petitioners, Accused of Offences Including Murder and Kidnapping, Seek Regular Bail After Rejection by Sessions Court Under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (and Sect...