Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Criminal Bail Application Involving Gaurav Arjun Patil. The Court Rules on Bail Sought Under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 141
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, heard an application for bail filed by Gaurav Arjun Patil against the State of Maharashtra. The matter was reserved for orders on April 8, 2025, and pronounced on April 15, 2025 by Justice Milind N. Jadhav. The applicant was represented by advocates Viral Rathod and Vishwatej Jadhav, while the State was represented by Special Public Prosecutor Hemlata Deshmukh. The court also appointed Mr. Dormaan J. Dalal as amicus curiae. The decision on the bail application is not detailed in the available text.

Issue of Consideration

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2893 OF 2024

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (04) 74

Criminal Bail Application No. 2893 of 2024

2025-04-15

Milind N. Jadhav

Mr. Viral Rathod, Mr. Vishwatej Jadhav for Applicant; Ms. Hemlata Deshmukh for Respondent; Mr. Dormaan J. Dalal, Amicus Curiae

Gaurav Arjun Patil

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Bail Application

Remedy Sought

Bail by applicant

Judgment Excerpts

Heard Mr. Rathod, learned Advocate for Applicant; Ms. Deshmukh, learned SPP for Respondent...

Procedural History

Application reserved for orders on April 8, 2025 and pronounced on April 15, 2025.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Lease Claimants in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Welfare Legislation Overrides Equitable Rights. High Court's Order Setting Aside HPC Decision and Allowing Redevelopment Upheld as Slum Act Takes Precedence Over Pro...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Franchise Dispute — Upholds Award on Refund of Security Deposit and Interest but Sets Aside Award on Loss of Profit and Other Claims. Court holds that arbitrator's findings on breach...