Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge to Arbitral Award in Slum Redevelopment Agreement Dispute. Petitioner Seeks Setting Aside of Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
13 Sep 2019...
Search Results for "contract basis"
6281 result(s) found
Found 6281 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Referral to Arbitration in Shipping Agency Dispute — Agency Agreement Arbitration Clause Enforceable Under Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court holds that disputes regarding termination and novation of agency agreement are covered by arbitration clause and must be referred to arbitration in Tokyo.
28 Jan 2014The judgment concerns two interconnected proceedings: Arbitration Petition No. 446 of 2003 filed by Mitsui OSK Lines Ltd. (petitioner) under Section 4...
- 124
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Co-operative Bank Appeal Against Sureties -- Holds Sureties Liable for Original Loan Under Section 133 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 -- Gujarat High Court Order Set Aside in Recovery Dispute
27 Feb 2026The Supreme Court allowed appeal by Appellant against High Court order that discharged sureties from all liability -- The Court held that under Sectio...
- 743
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award — Holds That Single Judge Erred in Setting Aside Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. The Court Reinstated the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Oral Agreement and Quantum of Damages.
20 Apr 2021The appellant, Ratnam Sudesh Iyer, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the judgment of a learned Si...
- 168
High Court
Bombay High Court Restrains Arbitration Against Non-Signatory Parent Company — No Arbitration Agreement Exists Between Plaintiff and Defendant No.1 Under Contract Between Subsidiary and Contractor. Court Holds That Absence of Privity of Contract and Definition of Parties in Arbitration Clause Preclude Binding Non-Signatory to Arbitration Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
14 Sep 2012The plaintiff, JSW ISPAT Steel Limited, filed a suit seeking a declaration that there is no arbitration agreement between it and defendant No.1, Jeumo...
- 147
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging MCGM Contract Awards in Public Interest Litigation. Court Finds No Irregularity in Tender Process and Upholds Validity of Contracts for Road Works.
5 Jul 2016The present Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Jayshree Ramakant Khadilkar Pande challenging the award of four contracts by the Municipal C...
- 154
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.
7 Nov 2025The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...
- 143
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in MSME Contract Dispute with Railways — Waiver of Section 12(5) Ineligibility Upheld. Petitioner's claim for additional wages dismissed as arbitrator's findings on facts and law were not patently illegal or against public policy.
11 Nov 2024The petitioner, M/s. Truly Pest Solution Private Limited, a Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise (MSME), was awarded a contract by the Central Railway f...
- 375
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit for Specific Performance — Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 52 Does Not Bar Transfer Pendente Lite, But Purchaser Must Be Heard Before Final Decree. The court held that a subsequent purchaser of suit property is a necessary and proper party under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, and amendment of plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC to incorporate subsequent events should be allowed.
9 Oct 2014The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a property. The original plaintiffs (appellants) filed Suit No.1241 of ...
- 217
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Order for Lack of Jurisdiction in Open Access Dispute. Electricity Distribution Company's Writ Petition Challenges CGRF's Retrospective Direction to Reduce Open Access and Enhance Contract Demand, Holding Dispute Falls Under MERC (Distribution Open Access) Regulations, 2016.
28 Nov 2023By way of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) chal...
