Search Results for "arbitrators jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "arbitrators jurisdiction"

803 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 803 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Vessel Maintenance Contract Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be in Conflict with Public Policy or Patent Illegality. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's interpretation that the respondent was not liable for pre-existing HOTO defects, as the contract did not impose such liability.

18 Oct 2010

The petitioner, Oil & Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. (ONGC), challenged an arbitral award dated 2nd April, 2008 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Depository Against Arbitral Award for Lost Shares Due to Third-Party Fraud. Court Holds That Depository Not Liable Absent Negligence or Breach of Contract Under Section 12(1-A) of SEBI Act, 1992.

2 Jul 2026

The case involves an appeal by Central Depository Services (India) Ltd. (CDSL) against a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 01/12/2025, which up...

High Court

Bombay High Court Commercial Division Considers Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Imposing Liability on Depository for Broker's Actions. The petition challenges the award's finding that CDSL must indemnify investor for breach by its depository participant despite the broker's misuse of power of attorney.

1 Dec 2025

Background: The petition pertains to a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against an arbitral award that held th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal, Holding Unregistered Award Partitioning Immovable Property Inadmissible Under Section 17(1)(b) of Registration Act. An arbitration award that purports to create or declare rights in immovable property over Rs. 100 is compulsorily registrable and cannot be taken into evidence to affect such property unless registered, overruling Patna and Punjab High Courts' contrary views.

27 Sep 1968

An arbitrator appointed by the parties partitioned their joint immovable property valued at over Rs. 100. The arbitrator delivered an award on October...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 87 of Arbitration Act as Unconstitutional — Automatic Stay of Arbitral Awards Revived by 2019 Amendment Held Arbitrary and Violative of Article 14. The court held that the provision reintroducing automatic stay upon filing of a Section 34 application is manifestly arbitrary and contrary to the object of the 2015 Amendment Act.

27 Nov 2019

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Section 87 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Appellate Authority Under RTI Act. First Appellate Authority under Right to Information Act, 2005 is not a 'Court' within the meaning of Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

12 Dec 2011

The Petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging breach of an order dated 29th May 2007 passed by the First Appellate Authority and Deputy Commission...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Price Adjustment Dispute Under World Bank-Financed Contract. Court Upholds Majority Award's Interpretation of Price Adjustment Clause but Modifies Interest Rate from 18% to 12%.

1 Oct 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Angerlehner Structurals & Civil Engineering Co., was awarded a contract by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MMC) for ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Grounds for Interference Established. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings Were Based on Evidence and Not Perverse, and the Petition Was Barred by Limitation.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside an arbitral ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Patent Illegality Found. Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contractual Clauses Held Plausible and Not Open to Interference.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before the B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows ONGC's Appeal and Dismisses Soconord's Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Oil Well Casing Pipes — Umpire's Award Upheld as Not Liable to Be Set Aside Under Section 30 of Arbitration Act, 1940. Court Held That the Learned Single Judge Erred in Setting Aside the Award on Grounds of Non-Consideration of Certain Aspects, as the Umpire Had Considered All Relevant Material and the Award Was Not Vitiated by Any Error of Law Apparent on the Face of the Record.

24 Jul 2014

The case involves cross-appeals arising from an arbitration dispute between Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) and M/s. Soconord OCTG, SA (S...

48 49 50 51 52

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)