Search Results for "amendment rules 2022"

1288 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1288 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging LARR Authority Orders Allowing Condonation of Delay and Amendment in Land Acquisition Reference. Procedural Flexibility Upheld Under Section 64 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 to Ensure Substantive Justice.

The petitioner, Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited, owned approximately 10 acres of land in Village Vikhroli, Mumbai, which was acquired by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Lease Rent Revision Based on Ready Reckoner Rates for Housing Societies in Bandra. Court holds that linkage of lease rent to land value is not per se prohibited and the Government Resolutions of 2006, 2012, and 2018 are constitutionally valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, upheld the constitutional validity of Government Resolutions (GRs) dated 29th May 2006, 12th Dece...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Surrogacy Rule Requiring Certificate of Genetic Abnormality for Intending Couple. Rule 1(d)(I) & (II) of Surrogacy (Regulation) Amendment Rules, 2023 held ultra vires the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 as it imposes additional condition beyond the Act.

The petitioners, a married couple, sought to have a child through surrogacy due to the wife's medical issues. They challenged Rule 1(d)(I) & (II) of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Petition and Income Tax Appeal for Non-Prosecution Due to Repeated Absence. Petitioner failed to appear on multiple hearings, leading to dismissal for default under Order 17 Rule 2 CPC read with Section 151 CPC.

The petitioner, Vaibhav Maruti Dombale, filed a Writ Petition (No. 1489 of 2025) and an Income Tax Appeal (No. 21746 of 2025) before the Bombay High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Amendment and Adjournment in Civil Suit — No Interference with Discretionary Orders Under Order VI Rule 17 and Order XVII Rule 1 CPC.

The appellants, original defendants in a civil suit, filed an appeal challenging two orders passed by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Gangakhed: (1) ...