KAHC010400602018_1
4 Sep 2024The appeals arose from the conviction of accused No.1, Smt. Uma, and accused No.2, Sri. Shivabasavegowda, by the trial court for offences under Sectio...
Search Results for "Trust objects"
947 result(s) found
Found 947 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Whether Assignee Bank Can Invoke SARFAESI Act for Debt Assigned by NBFC. The case involves interpretation of 'debt' and 'secured creditor' under SARFAESI Act, 2002 and RDDBFI Act, 1993, and the effect of assignment from a non-banking financial company to a bank.
16 Jul 2015The petitioner, a banking company, sought to enforce security interest under the SARFAESI Act after acquiring a debt and underlying security from a no...
- 22
High Court
SALES TAX REFERENCE NO. 52 OF 2009
8 Feb 2019The matter came before the Bombay High Court as two sales tax references arising from the assessment of M/s. Radhasons International, a partnership fi...
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Reference on Exemption for Bonded Warehouse Sales Under Section 5(2) of Central Sales Tax Act. Legal Issue Concerned Whether Transfer of Documents Before Filing Bill of Entry for Home Consumption Constitutes Sale in Course of Import Before Crossing Customs Frontiers.
8 Feb 2019The matter concerned two sales tax references made by the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arisin...
- 26
High Court
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Jurisdiction of Estate Officer Under Public Premises Act in Eviction Proceeding by Mumbai Port Authority. Lease Granted in 1962 for Construction of Building Does Not Confer Rent Control Protection as Premises Belong to Port Authority Exempted Under Section 4(1) of Bombay Rent Control Act and Section 4(4)(a) Exception Not Applicable.
5 Dec 2024The petitioners, Raian Nogi Karanjawala and another, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Estate Officer (respondent No.17) dated 22.11....
- 1437
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Part in Development Charge Levy Dispute. Development Charge on Already Developed Land Held Illegal Under Section 124 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
9 Dec 2022The petitioner, Sir Gangadharrao Chitnavis Memorial Medical Research Trust, a charitable trust, owned Plot No. 56 at Temple Road, Civil Lines, Nagpur....
- 131
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.
3 Aug 2017This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...
- 76
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against Discharge in POCSO Case. The Court Examines the Validity of the High Court's Order that Affirmed the Discharge of School Officials Accused of Failing to Report a Sexual Assault on a Minor.
1 Jan 1970This appeal arises from a Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 4772 of 2024, filed by the mother of an eight-year-old minor victim of sexual assault....
- 56
High Court
Full Bench of Bombay High Court Considers Whether Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act Lapses Acquisitions Under MRTP Act — Reference to Determine Interplay Between Central and State Land Acquisition Laws. The core issue was whether acquisition proceedings initiated under Sections 125-127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 fall within the lapsing provision of the 2013 Central Act.
13 Oct 2017The matter before the Full Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from three writ petitions filed by landowners whose lands were acquired under the prov...
- 38
