Search Results for "Stamp Rules"

1141 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1141 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds School Tribunal's Order of Reinstatement and Back Wages for Unfair Termination of Junior Clerk. Termination Order Set Aside as Management Failed to Prove Misconduct and Violated Principles of Natural Justice.

The Progressive Education Society and another (petitioners) challenged the judgment and order dated 11th August, 2000 passed by the learned Presiding ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging CBI Investigation in Bhima Koregaon Case — Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Not Required for CBI Officers. CBI Investigation Valid Under DSPE Act as Section 6A Struck Down by Supreme Court.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by individuals (Anant Pandurang Kale, Ashwini Kshirsagar, Naveen Kumar Rai and Siraj Razzak Bagwan, Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Judgment in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Non-Compliance and Limitation. Bank's Auction Sale Upheld as Borrower's Challenge Was Time-Barred and Requests Did Not Trigger Statutory Obligations Under Section 13(3A) of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The dispute arose from proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SAR...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order in Civil Suit — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Rejection of Application Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The court held that the trial court's order was a plausible view and did not warrant interference under Article 227.

The petitioners, who are defendants in a civil suit, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application Under Rule 133 for Delay in Seeking Adjournment to Judge — Security Order Already Set Aside by Higher Courts. Application Filed Beyond Four-Day Limitation Period Without Sufficient Cause Under Rule 133 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980.

The applicant, Suresh Lachhmandas Raheja, the original plaintiff in Suit No.3190 of 2006, filed an application under Rule 133 of the Bombay High Court...