Search Results for "Prosecutrix testimony"

529 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 529 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Death Sentence in Confirmation Case for Kidnap, Rape and Murder of 5-Year-Old Girl — Circumstantial Evidence Proved Guilt. Conviction Under IPC Sections 302, 363, 376(2)(f), and 201 Based on Last Seen, Preparation, and Medical Evidence Held Unassailable.

The case arose from the kidnap, rape, and murder of a five-year-old girl, Chakuli, in Nerli village, Kolhapur district, on the night of 24 October 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Sexual Assault of Minor Under POCSO Act and IPC — Evidence of Child Victim and Witness Found Credible Despite Minor Inconsistencies.

The appellant, Vikas Yashwant Madavi, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO Act), Thane, for sexually assaulting a 3½-year-old girl. The incident...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as victim's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support the prosecution case.

The appellant, Sadanand Kalya Pagi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar, for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. The court held that where the prosecutrix's testimony is inconsistent and lacks corroboration, bail may be granted under Sections 376-D, 363, 506 IPC and Sections 3,4,8,12 POCSO Act.

The applicant, Pratik Vilas Shelar, filed a bail application under the POCSO Act and IPC for offences including gang rape, kidnapping, and criminal in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Benefit of Doubt on Juvenile Status and Inconsistent Evidence. Claim of juvenility at time of offence not properly considered; conviction under Sections 302, 307 read with 34 IPC set aside.

The appellant, Channappa, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yadgir, in S.C. No. 40/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 307, 302 read with 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor Sister-in-Law by Brother-in-Law in Rape Case — Evidence of Victim Credible Despite Lack of Medical Evidence. The court held that the sole testimony of the victim, if credible, is sufficient to sustain a conviction under Section 376 IPC.

The appellant, Mohd. Sharif, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sections 376 and 506 (Part I) of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unexplained Delay in FIR. Conviction Under Sections 376 and 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shivaji Motiram Rathod, was convicted by the District Judge-6 and Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for offences under Sections 376 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeal by Convict Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 394 IPC for Murder and Robbery. The Court Examines the Admissibility of Test Identification Evidence and Recovery of Articles Under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, 1872.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, original accused no. 1, under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Bail Petitions and Refers Questions on POCSO Act to Division Bench. Single Judge observes conflicting views on Section 35 compliance and refers issues regarding default bail and evidence recording under Section 164 Cr.P.C., doubting Vinay v. State of Karnataka.

The case involved two criminal petitions filed before the Karnataka High Court by the accused, Hanumantha Mogaveera, seeking bail under Section 439 of...