Search Results for "Concession Rules"

964 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 964 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Disciplinary Entrustment Orders Passed Against BBMP Employees After Acquittal in Bribery Cases. Court Finds Government Failed to Apply Mind Under Section 12(4) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 and There Was Inordinate Delay in Initiating Proceedings.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru adjudicated two writ petitions filed by BBMP employees, K.S. Nanjegowda and N.G. Nataraj, who challenged gove...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Nagpur Bench Delivers Oral Judgment on Challenge to Parole Rule. The Court examined whether the proviso to Rule 19 of the Bombay (Furlough and Parole) Rules 1959, restricting parole to once a year except in death cases, violates Article 21 of the Constitution.

These writ petitions, filed by convicts in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, challenged the constitutional validity of the proviso...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Aurangabad Bench Has Jurisdiction Over Parole Rejection Order Passed at Nashik Central Prison — Reference Answered in Favor of Respondent Prisoner. Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Place of Confinement and Communication of Order, Not Solely by Location of Prison Authority.

The case arose from a reference made by a division bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad regarding its territorial jurisdiction to entertain a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...