Search Results for "Civil Judge (Junior Division)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Civil Judge (Junior Division)"

1720 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1720 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds State's Power to Appoint CEOs Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads Rules, 2014 — Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Appointments Quashed. The court held that the appointments were valid under Rule 4 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Appointment of Chief Executive Officer) Rules, 2014 and the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction.

27 Dec 2016

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions and civil applications challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) which set ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Tenancy Dispute — No Offence Made Out Under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC. Criminal prosecution for alleged forgery of lease deed and cheating fails as civil tenancy proceedings were pending and no fraudulent intention was established.

12 Oct 2011

The judgment arises from two connected criminal writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad. The first petition (Criminal W...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Suit Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC Due to Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance — Counsel's Engagement in Another Court Constitutes Sufficient Cause. The court set aside the ex-parte decree and restored the suit, holding that the trial court took a hypertechnical view and that procedural laws should be liberally construed.

13 Oct 2010

The Civil Revision Application was filed by Shri Bhimrao Pundalik Bhalerao (applicant) challenging the order dated 3rd December 2001 passed by the Civ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Secondary Evidence in Specific Performance Suit. Conditions under Section 65 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 for leading secondary evidence were not satisfied as plaintiffs failed to prove loss of original document and did not issue notice to produce.

14 Sep 2010

The petitioners, original plaintiffs in Regular Civil Suit No. 120/2006, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 21.12.197...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Decree in Civil Suit for Possession — Order IX Rule 13 CPC Application Held Maintainable Despite Decree Under Order VIII Rule 5(2) or Rule 10. The Court held that an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC is maintainable to set aside an ex parte decree passed under Order VIII Rule 5(2) or Rule 10 CPC, as the decree is still ex parte and the defendant can show sufficient cause for non-appearance.

10 Aug 2005

The case arises from Regular Civil Suit No.52 of 1992 filed by the respondent (plaintiff) against the petitioners (defendants) for possession of suit ...

Supreme Court

Title Dispute Over Suit Property – Second Appeal Allowed – Lower Court Findings Reversed. High Court set aside concurrent findings of the Trial and First Appellate Court – Plaintiff failed to establish ownership through title deeds – Revenue records do not confer title – Suit for injunction without proving ownership not maintainable – Appeal dismissed.

19 Mar 2025

High Court correctly held that plaintiff’s documents did not prove ownership. Revenue records are not conclusive proof of title. Oral partition clai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Appointment of Public Prosecutor for Pune District Due to Non-Compliance with Section 24 CrPC. Appointment made without consulting the Advocate General and without considering eligible Additional Public Prosecutors violates statutory requirements.

12 Aug 2005

The petitioner, Mrs. Neelima Sadanand Vartak, an Additional Public Prosecutor in Pune District since 1986, challenged the notification dated 1st June ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Possession and Declaration of Title — Remand Order Set Aside for Failure to Decide Limitation and Jurisdiction Issues. First Appellate Court Must Decide All Issues Before Remanding Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC.

5 Feb 2021

The present appeal from order was filed by the original defendants challenging the judgment and order passed by the learned District Judge-12, Auranga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Possession Suit, Holds That Bombay Rent Act Not Applicable to Village Agar. The Court set aside the appellate decree and restored the trial court's dismissal of the suit, finding that the respondent failed to prove the suit premises were not governed by the Bombay Rent Act.

1 Mar 2012

The case involves a suit for possession filed by the respondent (Jeroo Porus Karai) against the appellants (Khadi & Village Industries Commission and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Reference Under Section 36B of Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 — Civil Court Must Refer Issue of Sale Deed Validity to Competent Authority. The court held that the provision is mandatory and the civil court cannot decide the effect of the Act on a document itself.

12 Oct 2018

The petitioners, defendants in Regular Civil Suit No. 215/2013, challenged the order dated 29.06.2017 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division...

48 49 50 51 52

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)