Search Results for "vidarbha tenancy"

66 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 66 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Slum Declaration — Landowners' Appeal Rejected as Time-Barred Under Section 4 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971. Declaration of land as slum upheld as appeal filed after 22 years was grossly delayed and no sufficient cause shown.

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Survey No.51 in Ward No.19 of Municipal Council, Yavatmal, challenged the order dated 4/5/2010 passed by the P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Transfer Case Due to Violation of Section 29(3)(a) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Will Executed Without Prior Permission of Competent Authority for Class-II Occupancy Land Held Invalid.

The case involves a second appeal by the original defendant, Sakharam Shrawan Bhise, against the judgment of the lower appellate court which confirmed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Additional Commissioner's Orders in Gram Panchayat Disqualification Appeals. Delegation of Powers Under Section 13(3) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Remains Valid Despite Amendment to Section 16(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Amitkumar Bankar, challenged orders of the Additional Commissioner dated 18.01.2023 that set aside the Collector's disqualification of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Records — No Substantial Question of Law Arises as Dispute Pertains to Civil Rights and Title.

The petitioners, Tejram Hajare and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging mutation entries made in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellants' Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession. Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits Dismissed as Plaintiffs Did Not Discharge Burden of Proof Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute between the legal representatives of Balaji Ramaiya Manthanwar (appellants) and G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Waqf Tribunal Decree for Possession of Waqf Property. Defendants' claim of adverse possession fails as Waqf property is not subject to adverse possession under Section 107 of the Waqf Act, 1995.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendants (petitioners) against the decree passed by the Maharashtra Waqf Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Sale Agreement Due to Failure to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Appellants failed to demonstrate financial capacity and timely performance under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellants, Hemant M. Deshmukh, Ashok Varma, and Gyanchand D. Oswal, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 21/12/199...