KAHC010403282026_2
23 Jul 2026The petitioner, a partnership firm, challenged the award of a rate contract for supply of Liquid Sodium Hypochlorite Solution 5% 5ltr (drug code 430) ...
Search Results for "technical services outside India"
649 result(s) found
Found 649 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Appeals by Aggregators and Bike Taxi Owners Against State’s Refusal to Grant Permits for Bike Taxi Services. Dispute Centers on Whether Motorcycle Owners Are Entitled to Render Bike Taxi Services Under the Motor Vehicles Act and Karnataka Rules.
23 Jan 2026The case comprised five writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging a common order dated 02.04.2025 passed b...
- 23
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case — Assets Received from AE Not Taxable Under Section 28(iv) of Income Tax Act. The court held that assets received from Associated Enterprise without consideration are not taxable as perquisite under Section 28(iv) as they are not in the nature of 'benefit' arising from business or profession.
28 Jul 2025The Revenue (Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax) filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 again...
- 28
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows BEST and EVEY Appeals in Electric Bus Tender Dispute. Tender Condition Requiring 200 Km Range in Actual Conditions Upheld as Valid and Non-Arbitrary.
5 May 2023The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by BEST and EVEY Trans Pvt. Ltd. and set aside the Bombay High Court's order dated 05.07.2022. The dispute...
- 176
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Cancellation in DMICDC Project — Upholds Right of Tenderer to Withdraw Before Acceptance Under Section 5 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.
24 Aug 2017The Government of India envisaged the development of the Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMICDC), a large infrastructure project covering approximat...
- 176
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Award of Composite Works Contract to MSE Bidder, Holds Public Procurement Policy Inapplicable to Works Contracts. Composite Tender for Firefighting System Involving Design, Supply, and Erection is a Works Contract Not Covered Under Section 11 of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.
25 Jul 2017The dispute arose from a tender floated by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL), a public sector undertaking, for a comprehensive firefi...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Whether Service for Time Bound Promotion Should Be Reckoned from Initial Appointment or Regularisation Date. Government Resolution and Supreme Court Precedents on 'Regular Service' Interpreted in Context of TBPS and ACPS.
28 Apr 2016The case involved a batch of writ petitions filed by the State of Maharashtra under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orde...
High Court
Bombay High Court Admits Central Excise Appeal on Conditional Exemption and Cenvat Credit. The Appeal Raises Substantial Questions of Law Regarding Notification No.6/2006-C.E. and Credit on Aggregates Used in Export.
9 Sep 2014The Bombay High Court heard a central excise appeal filed by Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. against the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-V. The appell...
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Assessee in Income Tax Reference on Technical Service Fees — Payments for Deputation of Technical Personnel Held Not Royalty Under Section 9(1)(vi) of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court affirmed that payments received under service agreements for technical know-how and services are technical service fees covered by proviso to Section 9(1)(vii), exempt from tax.
8 Aug 2014The case involved an Income Tax Reference by the Revenue against the assessee, M/s Montedison of Italy, a non-resident company. The assessee had taken...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Prior adoption and registration of the mark 'KALPA-TARU' by the plaintiffs since 1977 and 2003, and the defendant's subsequent incorporation with a similar name in the same line of business, established a prima facie case for infringement under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
29 Jul 2011The plaintiffs, Kalpataru Properties Private Limited and Property Solutions (India) Private Limited, filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction again...
- 98
