High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case — Assets Received from AE Not Taxable Under Section 28(iv) of Income Tax Act. The court held that assets received from Associated Enterprise without consideration are not taxable as perquisite under Section 28(iv) as they are not in the nature of 'benefit' arising from business or profession.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Revenue (Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax) filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 13.12.2024 in ITA No.1550/Bang/2024 for Assessment Year 2017-18. The ITAT had upheld the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] dated 12.06.2024, which partly allowed the Assessee's appeal against the Assessment Order dated 19.05.2021. The core controversy pertained to an addition of Rs. 1,44,73,422/- made by the National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi (AO) under Section 28(iv) of the Act in respect of assets received by the Assessee (M/s. Sony India Software Centre Pvt. Ltd.) from its Associated Enterprise (AE) located overseas. The Revenue argued that the assets received without consideration constituted a benefit or perquisite arising from the Assessee's business and were thus taxable under Section 28(iv). The Assessee contended that the assets were capital receipts and not in the nature of income from business or profession. The CIT(A) and ITAT both deleted the addition, holding that Section 28(iv) was not applicable. The High Court, after hearing the Revenue's counsel, found that no substantial question of law arose and dismissed the appeal, confirming the ITAT's order.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Section 28(iv) - Benefit or perquisite - Assets received from Associated Enterprise without consideration - The court held that such assets are not taxable under Section 28(iv) as they do not constitute a 'benefit' arising from the business or profession of the Assessee, but are capital receipts not chargeable to tax. (Paras 1-3)

B) Transfer Pricing - Associated Enterprise - Addition under Section 28(iv) - The Revenue's addition of Rs. 1,44,73,422/- under Section 28(iv) for assets received from AE was set aside by CIT(A) and ITAT, and the High Court upheld the deletion, finding no substantial question of law. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether assets received by the Assessee from its Associated Enterprise without consideration are taxable under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as a benefit or perquisite arising from business or profession.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law, and upheld the ITAT order deleting the addition under Section 28(iv).

Law Points

  • Section 28(iv) of Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • Transfer Pricing
  • Associated Enterprise
  • Benefit or perquisite
  • Capital receipt vs revenue receipt
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (KAR) (07) 3

ITA No. 129 of 2025

2025-07-28

Vibhu Bakhru, Chief Justice, C M Joshi, Justice

Sri. Y V Raviraj, Advocate for appellants

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Bengaluru and The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-6(1)(1), Bengaluru

M/s. Sony India Software Centre Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Income Tax Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of ITAT.

Remedy Sought

Revenue sought to set aside ITAT order and confirm addition under Section 28(iv).

Filing Reason

Revenue aggrieved by deletion of addition of Rs. 1,44,73,422/- made under Section 28(iv) for assets received from AE.

Previous Decisions

AO made addition under Section 28(iv); CIT(A) partly allowed Assessee's appeal deleting the addition; ITAT upheld CIT(A) order.

Issues

Whether assets received from Associated Enterprise without consideration are taxable under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?

Submissions/Arguments

Revenue argued that assets received from AE without consideration constitute a benefit or perquisite arising from business, taxable under Section 28(iv). Assessee contended that the assets are capital receipts and not in the nature of income from business or profession.

Ratio Decidendi

Assets received from Associated Enterprise without consideration are not taxable under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as they do not constitute a 'benefit' arising from the business or profession of the Assessee, but are capital receipts.

Judgment Excerpts

The Revenue has filed the present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 impugning an order dated 13.12.2024 passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No.1550/Bang/2024 in respect of Assessment Year 2017-18. The controversy in the present case relates to (i) addition of `1,44,73,422/- made by the National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi under Section 28(iv) of the Act in respect of assets received by the respondent from its Associated Enterprise located overseas; and (ii) ...

Procedural History

Assessment Order dated 19.05.2021 for AY 2017-18 passed by AO making addition under Section 28(iv). Assessee appealed to CIT(A) which partly allowed the appeal by order dated 12.06.2024 deleting the addition. Revenue appealed to ITAT which dismissed the appeal by order dated 13.12.2024. Revenue then filed the present appeal under Section 260A before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 260A, 28(iv)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case — Assets Received from AE Not Taxable Under Section 28(iv) of Income Tax Act. The court held that assets received from Associated Enterprise without consideration are not t...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case for Interest from Date of Accident. Employer and Insurer Held Liable to Pay Interest Under Section 4A of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 from the Date of Accident, Not from the Date of O...