Search Results for "tariff concession"

94 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 94 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows AERA's Appeal Against TDSAT Orders Under Section 31 of AERA Act — Tariff Determination Held to Be Regulatory, Not Adjudicatory, Function. Regulatory Authority Can Challenge Appellate Tribunal's Decisions on Questions of Law.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Author...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Whether Refund Claim Under Customs Act Requires Appeal Against Assessment Order. Self-Assessment Under Section 17 and Amendment to Section 27 by Finance Act 2011 Examined.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals filed by assessees and the Union of India against judgments of various High Courts and the Customs, Excise ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case — Appellant Entitled to Cenvat Credit on Input Services. Definition of 'Input Service' Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is Broad and Includes Services Having Nexus with Manufacturing Business.

The appellant, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Private Limited, is a manufacturer of motor vehicles and parts, registered under the Central Excise Act. It file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Loan Processing Fee Refund. Bank's Circular Requiring Upfront Processing Fee Collection Held Binding on Consumer; Refund Denied to Avoid Unjust Enrichment.

The case involves a dispute between Bank of India (appellant) and M/s. Brindavan Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd. (respondent/consumer) regarding the refund ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India Decides Revenue Appeal Against Tribunal's Order on Excise Valuation of Fiat Cars. Assessee's Price Below Cost Held as Normal Price Under Section 4(1)(a) by Tribunal, Revenue Challenges on Ground That Price Did Not Reflect Manufacturing Cost and Profit.

The dispute concerned the valuation of Fiat Uno model cars for central excise duty under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The assessee, M/s ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses SEZ Developer's Petition for Octroi Exemption and Refund. State SEZ Policy Exemption Not Enforceable Against Municipal Corporation Without Statutory Amendment.

The petitioner, EON Kharadi Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) developer, sought exemption from octroi and refund of octroi paid ...