Search Results for "suo-motu writ petition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "suo-motu writ petition"

52 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 52 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of CIDCO's Lease Cancellation in Tender Dispute. The court held that CIDCO's cancellation was unjustified as the partnership firm's bid was initially accepted, changes were authorized, and no concrete breaches of tender terms were proven, applying principles of promissory estoppel and administrative fairness.

29 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from a tender called by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra (CIDCO) on 11.06.2008 for lease of land near ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Suo Motu Appointment of Next Friend Under Order XXXII Rule 15(3) CPC — Trial Court Must Hold Enquiry Before Finding Litigant of Unsound Mind. The court held that a litigant cannot be compelled to appoint a next friend without a proper enquiry into mental capacity.

15 Jun 2017

The petitioner, Sushma Kanpathak, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 13/06/2016 passed by the Trial Court i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order Under Section 340 CrPC — No Prima Facie Case for Perjury Made Out. The court set aside the order directing prosecution for perjury as the allegations did not establish intentional falsehood or expediency in the interest of justice.

15 Apr 2013

The writ petition challenged an order dated 06.03.2013 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Beed, in Misc. Civil Application No. 255 of 201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Revision Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Motu Revision Initiated After 15 Years Without Calling for Record Held Invalid Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

10 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Uttamrao Sampatrao Thakur, a resident of Hivara Bk., Majalgaon, Beed, filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Time-Barred Suo Motu Enquiry. Additional Commissioner Cannot Initiate Second Suo Motu Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 After First Remand Order Had Attained Finality.

10 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Uttamrao Ghatge, was a landholder from Salapuri, Parbhani, who filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated Beyond Three-Year Period Is Without Jurisdiction.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Ghanshyam Tukaram Solunke, was an original land holder in proceedings under the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Additional Commissioner's Suo Moto Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Issued After Eight Years Held Without Jurisdiction.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Tukaram S/o Gopalrao Nakate, a resident of Hadgaon, District Parbhani, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural...

High Court

High Court Quashes Suo Motu Reopening Notice Under Ceiling Act for Being Time-Barred — Limitation Period of 3 Years Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Must Be Strictly Adhered To.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioners, legal heirs of deceased Sidram Ganpatrao Solunke, were original land holders in proceedings under the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Inordinate Delay in Suo Moto Notice. Additional Commissioner's Power Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time, Not After 17 Years.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Shantabai Sundarrao Deshmukh, is the legal representative of Sundarrao Rangrao Deshmukh, who died on 31.01.1989. The husband of the pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Suo Moto Revision Notice Under Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act Due to Inordinate Delay. Notice Issued After 16 Years from Non-Surplus Declaration Held Unreasonable and Without Jurisdiction Under Section 45(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioners, legal representatives of deceased Marotrao Khupse, challenged a notice dated 13 July 1992 issued by the Additional Commissioner, Aura...

3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)