Search Results for "suo motu power"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "suo motu power"

1067 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1067 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Contempt Proceedings — Impleadment of Sitting Judge Not Permissible in Suo Motu Contempt. Filing of Scandalous Application Against Judge Constitutes Fresh Contempt and Professional Misconduct.

20 Apr 2026

The appellant,  an advocate, filed Criminal Writ Petition No.1612 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court on behalf of his client seeking a CBI inve...

High Court

High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices in Tenancy Case Due to 33-Year Delay and Land Conversion -- Proceedings Under Bombay Tenancy Act Barred When Land Converted to Non-Agricultural Use

21 Jan 2026

The petitioners challenged show cause notices issued under Section 84C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding land transactio...

High Court

High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Tenancy Act Case Due to Unreasonable Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction. Notice Issued After 14 Years Regarding Land Transactions Was Barred as Statutory Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time Under Sections 63 and 84C of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

21 Jan 2026

The petitioners, constrained to approach the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenged a show cause notice dated 12.12.201...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cancellation of Revenue Entry — Petitioner's Name to Continue in Revenue Records. Revisional Authority Failed to Consider Bona Fide Purchase Under Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879.

7 Jan 2026

The petitioner, Sintex Power Limited, purchased agricultural land in Village Lunsapur, Taluka Jafrabad, District Amreli, Gujarat, comprising Survey No...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Elephant Electrocution, Directs Comprehensive Measures for Wildlife Protection. The Court issued directions to prevent unnatural deaths of wild animals, emphasizing the State's duty to protect wildlife under Article 51A(g) of the Constitution and the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972.

26 Apr 2025

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, presided by Chief Justice N.V. Anjaria and Justice M.I. Arun, delivered a judgment in a suo motu public inte...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Cancellation of Land Allotment After 13 Years — Delay Unreasonable Despite No Limitation Prescribed Under UPZALR Act. Allottees Who Constructed Houses and Resided for 13 Years Have Legitimate Expectation; Suo Moto Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Period.

13 Mar 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had upheld the cancellation of land allotment to the appel...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Removing Land Entries in Victimization Case — Dual Stand by Government Authorities Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act and SC/ST Act Leads to Setting Aside of Impugned Order. The court held that the petitioner was victimized by the contradictory stands of the Assistant Commissioner under the Karnataka SC/ST (PTCL) Act, 1978 and the Deputy Commissioner under Section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, and quashed the order directing removal of entries.

17 Feb 2020

The petitioner, Krishnappa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash an order dated 10.11.2011 passed by ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Dispute Case — Holds Magistrate Can Order Further Investigation Post-Cognizance Under Section 173(8) CrPC. The Court clarified that the power to order further investigation is not extinguished by filing of charge-sheet or taking of cognizance, and can be exercised before commencement of trial.

16 Oct 2019

The case arises from an FIR lodged on 22.12.2009 by Nitinbhai Mangubhai Patel, Power-of-Attorney holder of Ramanbhai Bhagubhai Patel and Shankarbhai B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Registrar's Order for Suo Motu Inquiry Under Section 83 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — Application by Non-Member Cannot Trigger Inquiry. The Court held that an application for inquiry under Section 83 must be filed by at least one-third or one-fifth of the members, and a non-member's application cannot be treated as a valid basis for invoking suo motu powers.

4 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Vithalnagar Cooperative Housing Society, challenged two orders dated 21.07.2010 and 27.07.2010 passed by the Divisional Joint Registra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Amalgamation Notification for Lack of Consent — Amalgamation Under Section 44 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act Requires Consent of Both Market Committees. Withdrawal of Consent by One Committee Renders the Process Invalid.

17 Aug 2010

The petitioners, Sopanrao Sathe (Chairman) and the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Malkapur, challenged a notification dated 17-01-2009 ...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)