Search Results for "special planning authority"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "special planning authority"

1040 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1040 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs MCGM to Consider New Building Proposal Application Under Section 44 of MRTP Act on Merits. The court held that each application must be decided independently and the MCGM cannot refuse to consider a fresh application based on earlier rejections.

20 Sep 2022

The petitioners, Kaalkaa Real Estates Private Limited and its director Kanta Ramchandra Rane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Corporation's Land Acquisition for Road Construction Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. Municipal Corporation Validly Exercised Independent Powers Under MMC Act Without Requiring Road Inclusion in Development Plan Under MRTP Act, With Public Interest Justifying Acquisition Despite Property Owners' Objections.

2 Sep 2022

The dispute originated from the Municipal Corporation of Mumbai's efforts to acquire portions of the appellants' property for constructing a link road...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Land Owner's Consent Essential for Mode of Acquisition Under Section 126(1) MRTP Act — TDR Grant Requires Agreement, Not Unilateral Authority Action. The Court ruled that the option between monetary compensation and TDR under Section 126(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 is not solely with the acquiring authority but requires the consent of the land owner.

25 Jul 2022

This judgment arises from a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur, which disagreed with the view taken in Asha Sunil Z...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

23 Mar 2022

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Government Notice for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice in Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965 — Notice Issued Without Prior Hearing Violates Section 55A and Principles of Audi Alteram Partem.

18 Feb 2021

The Bombay High Court, in a common judgment, allowed two writ petitions challenging a notice dated January 6, 2017, issued by the Under Secretary to t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in MRTP Act Reservation Lapse Case — Purchaser Entitled to Benefit of Prior Owner's Section 49 Notice. Reservation Lapses Under Section 49(7) of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 When No Acquisition Within One Year of Purchase Notice, and Benefit Enures to Subsequent Purchaser.

14 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals against the Bombay High Court's order which had disposed of the writ petition filed by the appellants, purchaser...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Constitutional Validity of Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 in Public Interest Litigation. Sections 10-17, 33-37, and 39 of the Act are not unconstitutional as they provide for public participation and do not delegate essential legislative functions.

12 Feb 2020

The petitioner, The United Goans Foundation, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction on Public Trust Land. Held that the Municipal Corporation's action under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 was valid as the construction was on public property and no prior notice was required for demolition of unauthorized structures on public land.

20 Mar 2019

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the demolition of structures by the Municipal Corporation of Great...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Flyover Construction on Environmental Grounds — Held That Project Did Not Require Environmental Clearance as It Was a Linear Project on Existing Highway.

8 Aug 2018

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a flyover and road widening project on ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Development Charge Levy in Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the levy is a fee for services rendered and not a tax, and the amendment is within legislative competence.

13 Jun 2005

The petitioners, The Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society and another, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Regiona...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)