Search Results for "single vehicle accident"

256 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 256 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Negligent Driving by Tempo Driver. Court Awards Rs.7,70,000 with Interest at 7.5% per annum, Applying Multiplier of 16 and Adding 40% Future Prospects Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 29.04.1998 when Shabbirbhai Taiyebji Goriyawala was riding his motorcycle from Udhna Darwaja to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence Not Proved. Deceased Auto Driver Died in Single-Vehicle Capsize; No Evidence of Third-Party Involvement or Negligence, Hence Employer and Insurer Not Liable Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a claim petition filed by the legal representatives of the deceased, Govindaraj, who died in a motor vehicle accident on February...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, 304(A) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Rash or Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a road accident that occurred on 19.04.2011 at about 2.30 p.m. when an ambulance driven by the accused collided with an Alto car,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Driver in Employee's Compensation Case — Remands for Fresh Consideration on Merits. Commissioner's Dismissal for Default Set Aside as Claimant's Medical Evidence and Inability to Attend Were Not Properly Considered Under Employee's Compensation Act, 1923.

The appellant, Sandeep B.N., was a driver employed by the second respondent, B.N. Santhosh, driving a maxi cab bearing registration No.KA-03-D-5331. H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal Against Compensation Award for Traumatic Amputation. The Tribunal's assessment of 70% disability and award of Rs.5,02,600 under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was upheld as just and proper.

The case involves an appeal by the insurance company against an award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, granting compensation to the clai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Thresher Attached to Tractor Not a Motor Vehicle Accident Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Agricultural Labourer's Hand Amputated in Thresher Does Not Arise Out of Use of Motor Vehicle.

The appellant, Krishnaji @ Kisanji Ramaji Tadas, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Insurer in Goods Vehicle Passenger Death Case — Hirer Travelling with Goods Deemed Passenger Under Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. Division Bench Precedent on Risk Coverage for Hirer Travelling with Goods Followed.

The appellants, legal heirs of Shankar Laxman Barve, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, seeking compensation fo...