Search Results for "securitisation company"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "securitisation company"

181 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 181 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditor's Appeal in Co-operative Bank Liquidation Case, Holding Priority Over Workmen's Dues Under SARFAESI Act. Section 26E of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 grants overriding priority to secured creditors over all other debts, including statutory dues like provident fund and wages.

20 Nov 2025

The appellant, a secured creditor, had advanced loans to a co-operative sugar factory (the respondent Society). The factory became defunct and default...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Asset Reconstruction Company Against Borrowers in SARFAESI Act Matter — Upholds Single Judge's Order Quashing Possession Notice Due to Non-Compliance with Section 13(2) and (3A). The Court Held That the Secured Creditor Must Strictly Adhere to the Statutory Procedure Under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Before Taking Possession.

5 Jun 2024

The appellant, M/s. International Asset Reconstruction Company Limited, a secured creditor, issued a possession notice under the Securitisation and Re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assignee of Debt to Proceed Under SARFAESI Act Despite Company Being Under Liquidation. Assignee Steps into Shoes of Original Lender and Can Enforce Security Interest Under Section 13 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

13 Dec 2019

The petitioner, ASREC (India) Limited, is a company registered as a Reconstruction Company and Securitisation Company with the Reserve Bank of India u...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Bank's Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit Challenging SARFAESI Action — Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Suit Alleging Violation of RBI Guidelines and Fraud.

14 Nov 2019

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Bank of Baroda (applicant/original defendant) challenging an order dated 26/04/2018 passed by ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Order in Securitisation Application Matter. Maintainability of Appeal Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act Against Interim Orders of Debts Recovery Tribunal Upheld.

27 Jun 2019

The petitioner, Trishul Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order date...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision on Mandatory 75% Voting Share for Resolution Plan Approval Under I&B Code. Financial Creditors' Rejection of Resolution Plan for Kamineni Steel & Power India Pvt. Ltd. and Innoventive Industries Ltd. Leads to Liquidation as Plan Did Not Garner Required Majority.

6 Sep 2018

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals arising from a common judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 6 September 2018,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Decree-Holder in Execution Proceedings, Setting Aside Dismissal as Time-Barred. The court held that filing chamber summons and other applications constituted steps in aid of execution, extending limitation under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

18 Oct 2016

The case involves an appeal by Pratap G. Somaiya (the appellant/decree-holder) against an order dismissing his execution application as time-barred. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Act Order for Police Aid — No Locus Standi for Borrower's Partner After Property Sold to Third Party. The Court held that once the secured asset is sold and possession handed over to the auction purchaser, the borrower or its partner has no right to challenge the Section 14 order, and the remedy lies before the DRT under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.

9 Oct 2015

The petitioners, M/s. National Laminate Corporation (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Jayantilal L. Nisar, filed a writ petition under Article ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Application to Sell Matrimonial Home and Directs Husband to Pay EMIs in Family Court Dispute. The court held that the husband is liable to pay EMIs as maintenance and the wife may sell the property with court supervision to protect the matrimonial home from bank action under the Securitisation Act.

20 Mar 2013

The writ petition arose from an order of the Family Court No.7, Mumbai dated 23rd August 2011, which rejected the wife's application for direction to ...

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Financial Creditor's Appeal Against Rejection of Section 7 Application as Time-Barred. Application Under Section 7 of IBC, 2016 Filed Beyond Three Years from NPA Declaration Held Barred by Limitation.

30 Nov -0001

The appeal was filed by M/s. Canara Bank (Appellant/Financial Creditor) against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, which...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)