Search Results for "section 33(4)"

521 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 521 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Capital Gains Case — Section 54F Deduction Computation Clarified. Investment in new asset before due date of filing return qualifies for exemption even if return is filed late.

The appellant, Humayun Suleman Merchant, sold a plot of land in Mumbai on 29th April 1995 for Rs.85,33,250/-, resulting in a long-term capital gain. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Amendment of Section 88 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Insertion of Third and Fourth Provisos Permitting Government Extension of Time for Inquiry Against Delinquent Promoters is Constitutionally Valid and Not Retrospective Penal Legislation.

The dispute arose from an inquiry under Section 88(1) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 initiated against former directors of the Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Letters Patent Appeal Against Single Judge’s Order Upholding State Minister’s Decision in Evacuee Property Mutation Dispute. Minister's Order Had Set Aside Lower Authorities' Orders Restoring Evacuee Property Entries.

This Letters Patent Appeal arose from a dispute over evacuee properties in Lonavala. The original owner, Haji Habib Tar Mohammed Janu, migrated to Pak...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 4021 OF 2024N

The writ petition arose from a dispute over an agreement to sale dated 18/01/2022 between M/s. Radha Madhav Developers, a partnership firm, and the re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2486 OF 2005

The suit was filed by shareholders of Spice Jet Ltd, a domestic airline company formerly known as Modi Luft, which had undergone several ownership cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Withdrawal of Eligibility Communication Under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Interpretation of Section 9(c) of DTVSV Act: Pending criminal proceedings without charge-sheet or not relating to tax matters do not bar eligibility.

The petitioner, Reliance Industries Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the withdrawal of a communication dated 21st October 2020 issued by the...