Search Results for "section 32G"

110 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 110 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Tenancy Land Dispute — Petitioner Fails to Prove Deemed Purchase Under Section 32G of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Mere Revenue Entry as 'Kabjedar' Insufficient to Establish Tenancy Rights; Inordinate Delay in Filing Revision Also Fatal.

The petitioner, Shri Vitthal Maruti Bulunge, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition Quashing Exemption Certificate Under Section 88-B of Bombay Tenancy Act. Trust Not Registered on Tillers Day Cannot Claim Exemption; Tenants' Rights Vest on 1st April 1957.

The petitioners, tenants of agricultural lands owned by a public trust, challenged a certificate of exemption granted under Section 88-B of the Bombay...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 5539 OF 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Veekaylal Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Rules on Writ Petitions Challenging MRT Order on Tenancy Claim Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act. The decision addresses the validity of the tenancy declaration under Section 70(b) and Section 32G of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petitioners, who claimed to be Watandars, filed writ petitions in the High Court of Bombay challenging a common order passed by the Maharashtra Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Concurrent Orders Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act — Petitioner Failed to Prove Tenant Status. Landlord's Application for Possession Under Section 32-O Allowed as Tenant Could Not Establish Cultivation After Tillers' Day.

The petitioner, Shri Ananda Sakharam Padalkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admitted Second Appeal on Questions of Law Concerning Insolvency Act and Auction Sale Confirmation. The Court Framed Eight Substantial Questions Involving Interpretation of Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, Order 21 Rule 92 CPC, and Res Judicata in Tenancy Proceedings.

The matter concerned a long-standing insolvency dispute dating back to 1959. Roopsingh Chainsingh Ture filed Insolvency Application No.12 of 1959 befo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title. Court holds that admission of storage of rubble by defendants does not negate plaintiffs' possession of eastern side of suit property.

The second appeal was filed by original defendant nos. 1 and 2 challenging concurrent judgments and decrees granting declaration of title and injuncti...