Search Results for "seat and venue"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "seat and venue"

130 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 130 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Unilateral Appointment Clause Not Barred as Respondent Failed to Respond to Invocation Notice.

27 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Uttam Energy Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitral...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in International Commercial Dispute Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. Indian Courts Lack Supervisory Jurisdiction Over Arbitration Seated in Colombia Governed by Colombian Law.

18 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Disortho S.A.S., a Colombian company, and the respondent, Meril Life Science Private Limited, an Indian company, entered into an Inter...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitral Tribunal in EPC Contract Dispute — Respondent Failed to Respond to Invocation of Arbitration Clause. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as Respondent Did Not Object to Appointment Despite Notice.

20 Dec 2023

The applicant, Vedanta Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an Arbitra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act for Disputes Arising from Agreements Containing Arbitration Clause. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Disputes Between Parties.

11 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Hyund Construction Equipment India Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Chamber Summons Seeking to Set Aside Consent Terms in Arbitration Petition — Consent Terms Recorded by Court Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

22 Dec 2015

The applicants, original respondent nos.1 to 5, filed Chamber Summons No.905 of 2013 in Letters Patent Petition No.226 of 2013 and Arbitration Petitio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Single Judge's Order in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute — Parties Did Not Exclude Part-I of Arbitration Act by Choosing Foreign Law and Seat Abroad. The Court held that under the Bhatia International regime, Part-I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies to international commercial arbitrations held outside India unless expressly or impliedly excluded, and mere choice of foreign law and seat does not constitute implied exclusion.

6 Aug 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a Learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 15 November 2011, which held that the Court had no jurisdict...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Single Judge Order Dismissing Section 34 Petition Due to Foreign Seat and Governing Law — Interpretation of Escrow Agreement Clauses

31 Oct 2018

The appeal arose from a Commercial Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Katra Holdings Ltd., a Mauritius co...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator Due to Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause. Exclusive jurisdiction clause in Work Order vesting jurisdiction in Delhi courts ousts jurisdiction of Karnataka High Court under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Aug 2018

The petitioner, Polybond Organics Private Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fee Upon Withdrawal of Suit Under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Court Fee Deposited at Time of Filing. The court held that the proviso to Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC mandates refund of court fee when a suit is withdrawn unconditionally, and the trial court's rejection of the refund application was erroneous.

19 Aug 2025

The petitioner, Bindu Balakrishna Patali, filed a suit (Com. O.S. 150/2024) before the LXXXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Commercial Cou...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Calcutta High Court's Order Appointing Arbitrator Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Territorial Jurisdiction for Section 11 Application Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Depends on Court as Defined in Section 2(1)(e), Not Merely on Seat Designation in Arbitration Clause.

24 Mar 2022

The appeals arose from orders of the Calcutta High Court dated 13 August 2021 and 4 October 2021. The appellant and respondent had entered into a deve...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)