Search Results for "search and seizure before FIR"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "search and seizure before FIR"

534 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 534 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cognizance Order Against ACB Officers for Lack of Sanction. The Court Holds That Cognizance of Offences Alleged to Have Been Committed in Discharge of Official Duties Requires Prior Sanction Under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

5 Jul 2024

The matter arose from a private complaint filed by the respondent against seven officers of the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB), Bengaluru, alleging offe...

High Court

High Court Quashes FIR Against Licensee in Essential Commodities Act Case for Lack of Mandatory Sanction. Prosecution for Illegal Diesel Transportation Fails as No Sanction Under Section 6A of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 Was Obtained.

19 Jul 2023

The petitioner, Sadiq Pasha, a licensed transporter of diesel and operator of SWS & Sons Petrol Bunk, challenged the FIR in Crime No.137/2022 register...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Mining Offences Under MMDR Act and IPC. Prosecution Under MMDR Act Requires Complaint by Authorized Officer; Police FIR Without Authority is Illegal.

6 Feb 2019

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad dealt with a batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seekin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Common Order in Petitions Seeking Quashing of MMRD Act Proceedings Based on Lack of Police Jurisdiction. The Court Examined the Issue Whether Section 22 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Bars Police from Registering FIR Without Authorized Complaint.

6 Feb 2019

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Bench entertained a batch of petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in MMDR Act Cases Due to Lack of Authorisation. Police Registration of FIR for Mining Offences Without Competent Authority's Complaint Held Invalid Under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

6 Feb 2019

A batch of criminal petitions was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench, seek...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Multiple Criminal Proceedings for Offences Under MMRD Act and IPC; Non-Cognizable Offences Cannot Be Investigated Without Written Complaint by Authorized Officer.

6 Feb 2019

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, adjudicated a batch of twelve criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against CBI Investigation Order in NSEL Scam Case. Court holds that an applicant not an accused has no locus standi to challenge investigation orders under Section 397 CrPC.

4 Jun 2018

The applicant, Jignesh Prakash Shah, filed a Criminal Revision Application under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) before the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42 of NDPS Act, 1985. Secret Information Not Forwarded to Superior Officer, Search Vitiated.

3 May 2018

The appellant, Kallumal Jaidmal Kukareja @ Kallumama, was convicted by the NDPS Special Judge, Greater Bombay, for an offence punishable under Section...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Failure to Follow Mandatory Search Procedure and Reliance on Interested Witnesses Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

6 Aug 2015

The appellant, Chandpasha, was convicted by the District and Sessions Judge, Yadgiri, in Special Case No.1/2011 for offences under Sections 8 and 20 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under NDPS Act for Possession of Ganja — Section 50 Compliance Not Required for Baggage Search. Appellants convicted under Section 20(b) of NDPS Act for possessing 18 kg and 16 kg of Ganja; court held that Section 50 safeguards apply only to personal search, not to search of bags or articles.

13 Jan 2012

The case involves two appeals filed by Sandeep @ Santosh Waghmare (original accused no.1) and Suresh Tiwari (original accused no.2) against their conv...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)