Search Results for "sales tax assessment"

743 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 743 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Petroleum Dealers Challenging VAT Assessment Orders. Assessment orders under Dadra and Nagar Haveli Value Added Tax Act, 2005 set aside as barred by limitation and violative of natural justice.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by several petroleum dealers (M/s. Yogi Petroleum, Jay Jalaram Construction Co., M/s. Ratan P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act Due to Lack of Tangible Material and Mere Change of Opinion. Reopening of Assessment After Full Disclosure and Acceptance of Logo Fee as Revenue Expenditure in Previous Years Held Impermissible.

The writ petition was filed by the assessee, a limited company manufacturing kitchen appliances, challenging a notice dated 11.02.2014 issued under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Levy of VAT on Liquor by Certain Licensees; Alleged Discrimination Between Different Categories of Excise Licence Holders. Petitioners Contend That Notification Exempting Some Dealers While Taxing Others Violates Articles 14, 19, and 304B of the Constitution.

The writ petitions were filed by various licensees under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1967, challenging the constitutional validity of Entry No.59A of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Seeking Priority Over Sales Tax Dues. Sales Tax Department's First Charge Under Section 38C of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 Prevails Over Secured Creditor's Rights Under Securitisation Act, 2002.

The Thane Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. (the Bank) filed a writ petition challenging the action of the Sales Tax Department in attaching the property of M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...